Brewer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Brewer v. State

1925 OK CR 52, 234 P. 652, 30 Okla. Crim. 81, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 160

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 31, 1925

DocketNo. A-4712.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 52 (Brewer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brewer v. State, 1925 OK CR 52, 234 P. 652, 30 Okla. Crim. 81, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 160 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

The indictment in this case returned in the district court of Ottawa county and duly transferred to the county court of said county charges that Mark Brewer, the defendant, did unlawfully sell to Dave Porter one-half gallon of whisky, for a consideration of $6. On the trial the jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty, and fixing his punishment at confinement for 90 days in the county jail and a fine of $200. From the judgment he appealed by filing in this court June 4, 1928, petition in error with case-made, but no brief has been filed and no appearance *82 made on Ms behalf in this court. When the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal.

A cursory examination of the record discloses that there is no merit whatever in the various errors assigned.

The judgment of the lower court is accordingly affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, J.

The indictment in this case returned in the district court of Ottawa county and duly transferred to the county court of said county charges that Mark Brewer, the defendant, did unlawfully sell to Dave Porter one-half gallon of whisky, for a consideration of $6. On the trial the jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty, and fixing his punishment at confinement for 90 days in the county jail and a fine of $200. From the judgment he appealed by filing in this court June 4, 1928, petition in error with case-made, but no brief has been filed and no appearance *82 made on Ms behalf in this court. When the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal.

A cursory examination of the record discloses that there is no merit whatever in the various errors assigned.

The judgment of the lower court is accordingly affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 52, 234 P. 652, 30 Okla. Crim. 81, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewer-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.