Brewer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Brewer v. State

1925 OK CR 52, 234 P. 652, 30 Okla. Crim. 81, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 160

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brewer v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Okla. Crim. 191 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 31, 1925·No. No. A-4712.·Published

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

The indictment in this case returned in the district court of Ottawa county and duly transferred to the county court of said county charges that Mark Brewer, the defendant, did unlawfully sell to Dave Porter one-half gallon of whisky, for a consideration of $6. On the trial the jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty, and fixing his punishment at confinement for 90 days in the county jail and a fine of $200. From the judgment he appealed by filing in this court June 4, 1928, petition in error with case-made, but no brief has been filed and no appearance *82 made on Ms behalf in this court. When the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal.

A cursory examination of the record discloses that there is no merit whatever in the various errors assigned.

The judgment of the lower court is accordingly affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, J.

The indictment in this case returned in the district court of Ottawa county and duly transferred to the county court of said county charges that Mark Brewer, the defendant, did unlawfully sell to Dave Porter one-half gallon of whisky, for a consideration of $6. On the trial the jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty, and fixing his punishment at confinement for 90 days in the county jail and a fine of $200. From the judgment he appealed by filing in this court June 4, 1928, petition in error with case-made, but no brief has been filed and no appearance *82 made on Ms behalf in this court. When the case was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal.

A cursory examination of the record discloses that there is no merit whatever in the various errors assigned.

The judgment of the lower court is accordingly affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Brewer v. State, 1925 OK CR 52, 234 P. 652, 30 Okla. Crim. 81, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 160 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

1925 OK CR 52 (Brewer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.