Brewer v. State
This text of 1921 OK CR 92 (Brewer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in error was convicted on a charge of transporting intoxicating liquor from a point unknown in Hughes county to the town of Yeager on or about the 24th day of March, 1918, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined for 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $50. He appeals from the judgment.
The evidence shows that the defendant was arrested as he got off of the north-bound Prisco passenger train at the town of Yeager, by an officer, and a quart of whisky and a pint of alcohol was taken from his grip.
Por the defense, Sam Hughes, sheriff of Hughes county, testified that he is well acquainted with the defendant’s general reputation in the community where he resides for being an upright and law-abiding man, and that that reputation was good.
Dr. A. M. Butts testified that he was the defendant’s family physician. and about the date alleged was treating the defendant’s daughter, and advised the defendant that a teaspoonful of' whisky three or four times a day would help the girl to get better and advised the use of alcohol.
*724 As a witness in Lis own behalf the defendant testified that he lived a mile south of Yeager; that he had been at Port Worth, Tes., and had lawfully purchased this whisky for medicinal piirposes, under the advice of his family physician; that he did not have the whisky for the purpose of drinking it, or for the purpose of sale, but solely for medicinal purposes.
We deem it unnecessary to consider the various errors assigned. It is sufficient to say after a careful examination and consideration of the testimony we are of the opinion that the conviction is not sustained by the evidence. Wherefore the judgment is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1921 OK CR 92, 198 P. 341, 18 Okla. Crim. 723, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewer-v-state-oklacrimapp-1921.