Brewer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brewer v. State

860 S.W.2d 394, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1357, 1993 WL 328548

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brewer v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1167 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 31, 1993·No. No. 63115·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Steven Brewer, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the motion court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Steven Brewer, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the motion court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Brewer v. State, 860 S.W.2d 394, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1357, 1993 WL 328548 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

860 S.W.2d 394 (Brewer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.