Brewer v. State
This text of 134 S.E. 184 (Brewer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. No error was committed when the motion to continue was overruled.
2. Each ground of a motion for a new trial should be complete and understandable within itself; should of itself show error. Neither of the grounds of the motion based on the admission of evidence does this. There was no error in refusing a new trial on 'either of the grounds of the motion complaining of the admission of evidence.
3. There is ample evidence to support the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 S.E. 184, 35 Ga. App. 577, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewer-v-state-gactapp-1926.