Brewer v. State

134 S.E. 184, 35 Ga. App. 577, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 996
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 13, 1926
Docket17387
StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.E. 184 (Brewer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brewer v. State, 134 S.E. 184, 35 Ga. App. 577, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 996 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Blood wobte:, J.

1. No error was committed when the motion to continue was overruled.

2. Each ground of a motion for a new trial should be complete and understandable within itself; should of itself show error. Neither of the grounds of the motion based on the admission of evidence does this. There was no error in refusing a new trial on 'either of the grounds of the motion complaining of the admission of evidence.

3. There is ample evidence to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S.E. 184, 35 Ga. App. 577, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewer-v-state-gactapp-1926.