Brewer v. State

951 So. 2d 64, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3431, 2007 WL 701023
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 9, 2007
DocketNo. 5D06-3948
StatusPublished

This text of 951 So. 2d 64 (Brewer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brewer v. State, 951 So. 2d 64, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3431, 2007 WL 701023 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

LAWSON, J.

Robin Brewer seeks review of the trial court’s summary denial of her rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Because the trial court’s order fails to conclusively refute her claim, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

[65]*65Brewer pled guilty on December 16, 1994, to charges of second degree murder, conspiracy to commit robbery with a firearm and attempted robbery with a firearm. She agreed to an upward departure sentence, and was sentenced on the charge of second degree murder to forty-one years and four days, with a three-year minimum mandatory term imposed for use of a firearm. She was also sentenced to concurrent fifteen-year terms on each of the other counts.

In a prior postconviction motion, Brewer alleged that her sentence for the charge of second degree murder was illegal because the maximum punishment at the time of her offense was either life or a term not exceeding forty years. See Ferguson v. State, 804 So.2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Although it appears from the limited record on appeal that the trial court granted Brewer’s prior motion, it also appears that the court never entered an amended judgment correcting Brewer’s sentence. Therefore, in her current motion, Brewer again requests that her sentence be corrected to a term of years not exceeding forty years. Both below and on appeal, the State indicates that it has no objection to the trial court’s entry of an amended judgment and sentence order correcting Brewer’s sentence as requested in her motion. However, without attaching documents from the record refuting Brewer’s claim, the trial court summarily denied her motion.

Therefore, we reverse and remand for further consideration of Brewer’s motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

MONACO and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ferguson v. State
804 So. 2d 411 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
951 So. 2d 64, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3431, 2007 WL 701023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewer-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.