Brewer v. State

89 So. 841, 18 Ala. App. 163, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 138
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 31, 1921
Docket6 Div. 918.
StatusPublished

This text of 89 So. 841 (Brewer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brewer v. State, 89 So. 841, 18 Ala. App. 163, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 138 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

MERRITT,. J..

The appellant is being held in the Jefferson county jail under an indictment charging him with murder in the first degree, the killing of Herbert Kuykendall. On a hearing for bail, under his peti *164 tion of habeas corpus, addressed to and heard by Hon. H. P. Heflin, judge of the criminal division of the Tenth judicial circuit of Alabama, he was denied bail, and from such judgment he has appealed to this court. n

There are two reasons why this court cannot consider the merits qf the petition.

[1] In the first place, the defendant has not perfected an appeal in the case, in that he has failed to file a written statement signed by the defendant or his attorney that the defendant appeals from the judgment, as provided for by section 7 of an act approved February 15, 1919. Acts Ala. 1919, p. 86.

[2] In the second place, if the appeal had been perfected, we would be unable to say that the trial judge had erred in refusing bail, in that the bill of exceptions does not purport to set out all or substantially all of the evidence.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 So. 841, 18 Ala. App. 163, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewer-v-state-alactapp-1921.