Brewer v. Nash

106 F. App'x 758
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedAugust 30, 2004
DocketNo. 00-2269
StatusPublished

This text of 106 F. App'x 758 (Brewer v. Nash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brewer v. Nash, 106 F. App'x 758 (2d Cir. 2004).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

On February 7, 2000, appellant Anthony Brewer filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in the District Court. In a decision and order entered March 30, 2000, the District Court denied and dismissed the petition, and the Court entered judgment against appellant on the same date. On November 13, 2001, the District Court denied appellant’s motion for reconsideration, which it disposed of upon remand from this Court. See Brewer v. Nash, 5 Fed. Appx. 89 (2d Cir.2001). Pursuant to our remand order, appellant’s notice of appeal which he had filed on May 4, 2000, to challenge the District Court’s denial of his § 2241 petition automatically became effective upon the November 13, 2001 entry of the District Court’s order disposing of appellant’s motion for reconsideration. Id. Accordingly, on December 27, 2002, we reinstated appellant’s appeal challenging the denial of his § 2241 petition.

Having now before us that challenge to the District Court’s denial of appellant’s habeas petition, we have considered all of appellant’s arguments and found each of [759]*759them to be without merit, and we AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brewer v. Nash
5 F. App'x 89 (Second Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 F. App'x 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewer-v-nash-ca2-2004.