Brewer v. Murray

2012 OK 100, 290 P.3d 758, 2012 Okla. LEXIS 101, 2012 WL 5845571
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 19, 2012·No. No. 109282·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

10 ORDER.

€ 1 Having considered the parties' notice of settlement, the Court's Order of October 23, 2012, the petition for certiorari and response thereto filed in the above styled and numbered cause, THE COURT DETERMINES:

1) Appellee's petition for certiorari should be dismissed. Goldman v. Goldman, 1994 OK 111, 883 P.2d 164, 166; Order of this Court herein, October 23, 2012.
2) The opinion promulgated by the Court of Civil Appeals, Division II, in the above styled and numbered cause should be accorded precedential value and released for publication by order of this Court. Rule 1.200, Supreme Court Rules, 12 0.8.2011, Ch. 15, App. 1; 20 0.8.2011 §§ 30.5 and 30.14.

12 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Appellee's petition for certiorari is dismissed, and the Court of Civil Appeals opinion be accorded precedential value and released for publication by order of this Court.

T3 DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012.

Concur: TAYLOR, C.J., WATT, EDMONDSON, REIF, GURICH, JJ. [759]*759Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part: COLBERT, V.C.J., KAUGER, WINCHESTER, COMBS, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brewer v. Murray, 2012 OK 100, 290 P.3d 758, 2012 Okla. LEXIS 101, 2012 WL 5845571 (Okla. 2012).

2012 OK 100 (Brewer v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

NELSON v. ENID MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
2016 OK 69 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2016)