Brewer v. Montgomery

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-10335

Conference Calendar

VAN LEE BREWER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SALLY MONTGOMERY, Judge, 95th Judicial District, Dallas; BARBARA JACKSON, Court Administrator for 95th Judicial District Court, Dallas; FRANCES McNAIR, Deputy Clerk, District Clerk’s Office; BILL LONG, Dallas County’s former District Clerk; JIM HAMLIN, District Clerk, Dallas County; JANE DOES, unknown deputy clerks for the 95th Judicial District Court; LARRY S. KAPLAN, Attorney; MICHAEL I. KAHN, Attorney,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:99-CV-2267-T

- - - - - - - - - -

October 18, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Van Lee Brewer, Texas prisoner # 527494, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b)(1) and 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). We have reviewed the record and Brewer’s

*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 00-10335

-2-

brief, and we conclude that the district court did not err in its judgment.

Brewer’s assertion of a conspiracy among the named defendants to deny him his right of access to the courts is not supported by anything other than his own conclusional allegations, an insufficient showing under § 1983. See Russell v. Millsap, 781 F.2d 381, 383 (5th Cir. 1985). His claims of individual liability among the defendants for interference with his right of access to the courts are similarly conclusional. The district court’s judgment of dismissal is therefore AFFIRMED.