Home/Supreme Court of Oklahoma/Brewer v. Fay

Brewer v. Fay

1936 OK 262, 55 P.2d 1035, 176 Okla. 342, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 189
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 24, 1936
DocketNo. 26773.
StatusPublished

This text of 1936 OK 262 (Brewer v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brewer v. Fay, 1936 OK 262, 55 P.2d 1035, 176 Okla. 342, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 189 (Okla. 1936).

Opinion

*343 PBS CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dissolving garnishment and discharging garnishee. The appeal is by transcript. A motion to dismiss has been filed which states that under Exchange National Bank v. Merritt, 108 Okla. 184, 235 P. 180, this court will not review the error of which complaint is made. A response to the motion to dismiss was ordered by this court, but none has been filed. It appears from the authorities cited that the errors complained of cannot be reviewed on transcript.

The appeal is dismissed.

McNEILL, C. J., and BATLESS, PHELPS, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Exchange Nat. Bank of Ardmore v. Merritt
1925 OK 273 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1936 OK 262, 55 P.2d 1035, 176 Okla. 342, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewer-v-fay-okla-1936.