Brewer v. Fay

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Brewer v. Fay

1936 OK 262, 55 P.2d 1035, 176 Okla. 342, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 189

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 24, 1936·No. No. 26773.·Published

Opinion

*343 PBS CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dissolving garnishment and discharging garnishee. The appeal is by transcript. A motion to dismiss has been filed which states that under Exchange National Bank v. Merritt, 108 Okla. 184, 235 P. 180, this court will not review the error of which complaint is made. A response to the motion to dismiss was ordered by this court, but none has been filed. It appears from the authorities cited that the errors complained of cannot be reviewed on transcript.

The appeal is dismissed.

McNEILL, C. J., and BATLESS, PHELPS, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*343 PBS CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dissolving garnishment and discharging garnishee. The appeal is by transcript. A motion to dismiss has been filed which states that under Exchange National Bank v. Merritt, 108 Okla. 184, 235 P. 180, this court will not review the error of which complaint is made. A response to the motion to dismiss was ordered by this court, but none has been filed. It appears from the authorities cited that the errors complained of cannot be reviewed on transcript.

The appeal is dismissed.

McNEILL, C. J., and BATLESS, PHELPS, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Brewer v. Fay, 1936 OK 262, 55 P.2d 1035, 176 Okla. 342, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 189 (Okla. 1936).

Pincite

1936 OK 262 (Brewer v. Fay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related