Brewer v. City of Daytona Beach
This text of 228 So. 2d 916 (Brewer v. City of Daytona Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks review of an award for damages in an eminent domain proceeding. The court has carefully considered the points raised by appellant in her brief and in oral argument before the court and finds them to be without merit. A review of the record fails to reveal the occurrence of error in the manner in which the case was tried below. The amount awarded as damages by the jury was supported by competent evidence, and we are not inclined to substitute our judgment for that of the jury. Eastern Shopping Centers, Inc. v. State Road Department, 192 So.2d 785 (Fla.App.2d 1966).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 So. 2d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewer-v-city-of-daytona-beach-fladistctapp-1969.