Brewer v. Cabarrus Plastics, Inc.
This text of 579 S.E.2d 249 (Brewer v. Cabarrus Plastics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse that portion of the decision of the Court of Appeals; we also conclude that *150 our order allowing defendant’s petition for discretionary review of an additional issue was improvidently allowed.
The result in the Court of Appeals did not require it to reach other issues properly preserved and raised on appeal. Because we now reverse the Court of Appeals’ decision as to the only issue it addressed, on remand, that court should also consider plaintiff’s remaining issues.
REVERSED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
579 S.E.2d 249, 357 N.C. 149, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewer-v-cabarrus-plastics-inc-nc-2003.