BREWER v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP

• Court: District Court, D. New Jersey
• Decided: April 28, 2023
• Docket: 2:18-cv-04461
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN RE: PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS 2:17-MD-2789 (CCC)(LDW) LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL 2789)

This Document Relates to: OPINION AND ORDER All cases listed in Exhibit A

CECCHI, District Judge. I. Introduction This matter comes before the Court upon Case Management Order (“CMO”) No. 65, ECF No. 723, entered on December 2, 2021, which identified 1,535 cases in which AstraZeneca LP (“AZLP”), AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP (“AZPLP”), and Merck & Co. Inc. d/b/a Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation (“Merck”) (collectively, the “AZ Defendants”) alleged that service of the summons and complaint had not been effected and in which no proof of service appeared on the docket of the case. CMO No. 65 ordered Plaintiffs in those cases within thirty days to (1) establish that service was effected on the AZ Defendants identified in Exhibit A to CMO No. 65, as required by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure1 by filing proof of service, (2) voluntarily dismiss the AZ Defendants, or (3) show cause why the AZ Defendants should not be dismissed within thirty days of entry of the Order. CMO No. 65, at 2 CMO No. 65 ordered Plaintiffs to file their responses on the dockets of the individual cases, and permitted the AZ Defendants to oppose within thirty days of each plaintiff’s response.2 Plaintiffs were specifically

1 All references to Rules herein are to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2 At the request of the parties, the deadline for Plaintiffs to file responses to CMO No. 65 was extended to March 31, 2022, and then to June 30, 2022. See CMO No. 67, at § I.D, ECF No. 747; CMO No. 70, at ¶ B, ECF No. 769. The deadline for the AZ Defendants to oppose each plaintiff’s advised that “[f]ailure to comply with the terms of this Order will result in the dismissal of the case as to the identified AZ Defendants.” CMO No. 65, at 2.

II. Legal Standard Rule 4 governs the requirements regarding serving a summons. In particular, Rule 4(m) requires that “[i]f a defendant is not served 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court – on motion or on its own after notice to plaintiff – must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). In the Third Circuit, establishing good cause requires a “demonstration of good faith on the part of a party seeking an enlargement and some reasonable basis for

noncompliance with the time specified in the rules.” MCI Telecomms. Corp., 71 F.3d at 1097.3 In the absence of a showing of good cause for failure timely to effect service, the Court has discretion either to dismiss a case or permit an extension. Id. at 1098 (citing Petrucelli v. Bohringer & Ratzinger, 46 F.3d 1298, 1305 (3d Cir. 1995)). It is the plaintiff’s burden to demonstrate good cause for such failure to effectuate timely service or to persuade the Court to exercise its discretion and not dismiss the AZ Defendants from their cases. Spence v. Lahood, No. 11-3972, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80015, at *15 (D.N.J. June 8, 2012) (citing McCurdy v. Am. Bd. of Plastic Surgery, 157 F.3d 191, 196 (3d Cir. 1998)).

response was extended to May 15, 2022, then to August 16, 2022, and then to October 17, 2022. See CMO No. 67, at § I.D, ECF No. 747; CMO No. 70, at ¶ B, ECF No. 769; CMO No. 78, at ¶ A, ECF No. 841. 3 Plaintiffs note that the version of Rule 4 quoted in MCI Telecomms is no longer applicable after an amendment in 1993. The amendment removed “good cause” as an absolute prerequisite for an extension of service. However, as explained above, the good cause standard still exists in Rule 4(m). The amendment merely allows courts, in the absence of good cause, to exercise their discretion to allow an extension if the circumstances warrant. Notably, the Court’s Opinion and Order here is based on the current version of Rule 4(m). III. Discussion As stated above, CMO No. 65 ordered the identified Plaintiffs within thirty days to either establish that service was properly effectuated pursuant to Rule 4(m), voluntarily dismiss the AZ Defendants, or show cause why the AZ Defendants should not be dismissed. CMO No. 65 did not provide Plaintiffs with an extension of time to serve the Complaint, instead, it directed Plaintiffs

to prove that service had in fact been effectuated or to “show cause why the AZ Defendants should not be dismissed.” The 1,181 Plaintiffs in the cases identified on Exhibit A herein have failed to satisfy the requirements of CMO No. 65. Plaintiffs do not claim to have timely served the AZ Defendants in compliance with Rule 4(m). See CMO No. 7, at § II.D (“Absent agreement of the parties or subsequent Order of the Court, service of process shall be effectuated as required under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”).4 While there is disagreement between Plaintiffs and the AZ Defendants concerning the fact or date of service in some of the cases here, it is undisputed that in the cases in which the AZ Defendants were served, service was effected only after CMO

No. 65 was entered. In fact, of these 1,181 cases (and utilizing the earlier purported date of service in the event that the parties did not agree on the date of service), service was made between one to two years after the ninety-day period in Rule 4(m) in 9 cases; between two to three years after the ninety-day period in 228 cases; and between three to just over four years after the ninety-day period in 944 cases. Further, no Plaintiff here has dismissed the AZ Defendants from their case. Finally, as further elaborated below, Plaintiffs have not shown cause why the AZ Defendants should not

4 Though not relevant in these cases, the Court notes that AZLP, AZPLP, and Merck agreed to accept service of a Complaint by email at PPIComplaints@icemiller.com. CMO No. 27, at § I.D, ECF No. 260 be dismissed. Accordingly, due to untimely service and lack of good cause shown, it is appropriate that the AZ Defendants be dismissed from the cases identified in Exhibit A. a. Plaintiffs Do Not Demonstrate Good Cause Mandating an Extension of Time to Serve

Plaintiffs’ responses to CMO No. 65 do not demonstrate good cause excusing their lack of timely service pursuant to Rule 4(m). Good cause requires “a demonstration of good faith on the part of the party seeking an enlargement . . . and some reasonable basis for noncompliance with the time specified in the rules.” MCI Telecomms. Corp., 71 F.3d at 1097. To determine whether good cause exists, the Court considers “(1) reasonableness of plaintiff’s efforts to serve (2) prejudice to the defendant by lack of timely service and (3) whether plaintiff moved for an enlargement of time to serve.” Id. The primary focus must always be on “the plaintiff’s reasons for not complying with the time limit in the first place.” Id. Yet here, Plaintiffs have not even attempted to show good cause for their failure to timely serve or addressed the reasons for untimeliness. See, e.g., Pl. Lawrence Lucerne’s Resp. to Orders to Show Cause Regarding Service of Process, at 22-24, No. 2:19-cv-04209, ECF No. 8 (“Lucerne Resp.”). Accordingly, as the Court further explains, Plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate good cause for failure to timely serve in compliance with Rule 4(m). As an initial matter, the Court notes that Plaintiffs responded to CMO No. 65 by filing virtually identical responses that do not reference the AZ Defendants’ specific conduct. These responses attached an exhibit with limited information about the Plaintiffs’ individual cases, but

did not include any documentation to support their assertions in the exhibit. The information in these exhibits filed by Plaintiffs includes such information as the date of alleged service (if any), whether a defendant had filed a notice of appearance, whether a defendant had filed a short form answer, whether a Plaintiff Fact Sheet had been uploaded to Marker Group, whether a Defense Fact Sheet had been served, and whether a defendant had sent a deficiency letter related to the Plaintiff Fact Sheet. See, e.g., Lucerne Resp.; Pl. Michael Lopez’s Resp. to Order to Show Cause Regarding Service of Process, Ex. A, No. 2:18-cv-04494, ECF No. 15 (“Lopez Resp.”). In addition, Plaintiffs’ briefing does not address any reasons for the failure to timely serve and instead focuses on arguments concerning the AZ Defendants’ purported waiver of service and the Court’s

authority for discretionary extensions. See Houser v. Williams, No. 16-9072, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43518, at *6 (D.N.J. Mar. 12, 2020) (finding dismissal warranted where plaintiff did not serve the complaint for months after an agreed-upon extension and then failed to detail any steps he took towards serving defendant within the extended time afforded by the court). Turning to the factors for evaluating good cause, the first factor examines the reasonableness of the plaintiff’s efforts to serve the complaint. As noted, Plaintiffs offer no explanation for the failure to timely serve, nor an adequate description of reasonable steps that Plaintiffs took to effect timely service as required by Rule 4(m). And none of the Plaintiffs at issue here were close to satisfying timely service under Rule 4(m). As previously stated, in all 1,181

cases, service was effected at least one year after the ninety-day period under Rule 4(m) had lapsed; indeed, in 944 cases, or approximately 80 percent, service was effected over three years after the ninety-day period under Rule 4(m) had lapsed. Given Plaintiffs’ lack of sufficient efforts to serve the complaint, this factor weighs heavily in favor of the AZ Defendants. Under the second factor, the Court considers prejudice to the AZ Defendants by lack of timely service. Here, Plaintiffs’ failure to serve caused the AZ Defendants to expend time and resources through investigation, consultation with opposing counsel, and advocating for and responding to case management orders – all to determine whether Plaintiffs intended to pursue litigation against them. W. Coasts Quartz Corp. v. M.E.C. Tech, Inc., 2017 WL 1944197, at *2 (D.N.J. May 9, 2017). Moreover, this Court has previously determined that the AZ Defendants had been prejudiced by the delayed service or non-service. See Order Regarding CMO No. 65, at 7, ECF No. 890. Given the prejudice to the AZ Defendants resulting from Plaintiffs’ failure to timely serve, this factor also cuts against good cause. And even if Plaintiffs had demonstrated lack of prejudice to the AZ Defendants, “absence of prejudice alone can never constitute good cause to

excuse late service.” MCI Telecomms Corp., 71 F.3d at 1097. Finally, under the third factor, while Plaintiffs have now requested an extension of time to serve the AZ Defendants, they did so only after CMO No. 65 was entered, which was a year or more after the time to serve the AZ Defendants in compliance with Rule 4(m) had lapsed. See, e.g., Lucerne Resp.; Lopez Resp. Plaintiffs have not explained why they did not request an extension of time to serve the AZ Defendants until after CMO No. 65 was entered by this Court. Accordingly, this factor similarly weighs in favor of the AZ Defendants and against Plaintiffs’ showing of good cause. Considering the three factors used to evaluate whether good cause has been demonstrated,

Plaintiffs here have not demonstrated good cause for their failure to serve the AZ Defendants in compliance with Rule 4(m). b. Plaintiffs Have Not Persuaded the Court that a Discretionary Extension is Warranted

In the absence of a showing of good cause mandating an extension to effectuate service, the Court nonetheless has discretion to either dismiss the case or permit extension. Because Plaintiffs have not established good cause, see supra, they must rely on the Court’s discretionary authority to excuse failures to comply with Rule 4(m). See Edwards v. Hillman, 849 F. App’x. 23, 25 (3d Cir. 2021) (citing Petrucelli, 46 F.3d at 1305). The Court’s exercise of discretion in this area is guided by various factors, including: “actual notice of the legal action; prejudice to the defendant; the statute of limitations on the underlying causes of action; the conduct of the defendant; and whether the plaintiff is represented by counsel, in addition to any other factor that may be relevant.” Chiang v. U.S. Small Bus. Admin., 331 Fed. App’x 113, 116 (3d Cir. 2009); see also Spence, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80015, at *15. Here, considering these factors, Plaintiffs have not met their burden in persuading the Court that such discretion should be exercised under these

circumstances. With respect to the first factor—actual notice of the legal action—Plaintiffs argue that the AZ Defendants were on notice of their claims through their tolling agreement, which provided Plaintiffs time to obtain information about their claims before filing a complaint.5 However, the fact that a plaintiff was on the tolling agreement and may potentially bring a claim against the AZ Defendants or another defendant does not mean that the AZ Defendants had actual legal notice that a particular plaintiff would be pursuing his or her claim against the AZ Defendants in a legal action. In re Asbestos Prod. Liab. Litig. (No. VI), upon which Plaintiffs rely for their argument that

a court may extend the time for proper service if the defendant had “actual notice of the pending action,” is instructive. 2014 WL 1903904, at *1 (E.D. Pa., May 12, 2014); see Lucerne Resp. at 9- 10 (citing Asbestos). The issue there concerned the appropriateness of a specific method of service by mail under Ohio law—not untimely service that occurred anywhere from one to four years past

5 In June 2018, the parties entered into a tolling agreement concerning the statute of limitations. In order to obtain the benefit of tolling under the tolling agreement, a claimant had to provide the following information to all defendants: name and date of birth of the PPI user, name(s) of any derivative claimant(s), city and state of residence, date of first PPI use, date of last PPI use, alleged injury, and name of claimant’s counsel. The Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee was to compile this information and submit it to the defendants on an Excel spreadsheet on a monthly basis. See Stip. Regarding Tolling of Stats. of Lims., ECF No. 232, at 1-2. The data required to be provided to all defendants in the tolling agreement did not identify specific defendants whose product(s) were allegedly used by individual plaintiffs. the Rule 4(m) deadline. Notably, the court found that the defendants were on “actual legal notice” of the pending action because the plaintiffs provided proof of a green card signed by the defendant, evidencing receipt of the original process papers by defendants’ counsel, which the court found acceptable under Ohio state law. Asbestos, 2014 WL 1903904, at *1. By contrast, Plaintiffs here have not offered any similar evidence of actual notice. Indeed, as the AZ Defendants argue, the

tolling agreement “covered Plaintiffs who could not yet show proof of use as to a Defendant’s product” and, moreover, did not identify a specific defendant or which PPI products were at issue as to a particular potential plaintiff. See, e.g., No. 19-cv-04209, ECF No. 10 at 10 n.3. Therefore, Plaintiffs’ reliance on Asbestos is misplaced and they have not demonstrated that the AZ Defendants had actual notice of pending litigation. Turning to prejudice to the defendant—the second factor—the Court reiterates its analysis when discussing the same factor in the context of good cause. See supra III.a (noting the AZ Defendants expended time and resources through their repeated attempts to determine whether Plaintiffs intended to pursue litigation against them, including their own independent inquiries, as

well as meetings with counsel and the special master). Further, this Court has previously found in this MDL (with respect to a different defendant) that “[w]asted time and resources and inconvenience standing alone may constitute sufficient prejudice to warrant dismissal.” CMO No. 63 at 7 (citing Miller v. Advocare, LLC, No. 12-01069, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71451, at *8-9 (D.N.J. May 21, 2013). Accordingly, this factor weighs against Plaintiffs’ request. Regarding the statute of limitations, the third factor, Plaintiffs argue that the applicable statute of limitations in most, if not all, of the actions subject to CMO No. 65 has expired. See, e.g., Lucerne Resp. at 21. However, “the expiration of the statute of limitations does not require the court to extend the time for service, as the court has discretion to dismiss the case even if the refiling of the action is barred.” MCI Telecomms. Corp., 71 F.3d at 1098. Given the length of time between filing and service in the cases of these Plaintiffs—in some cases over four years— Plaintiffs’ argument that the potential lapse of the statute of limitations warrants extension is not compelling. Relatedly, Plaintiffs have not alleged that the AZ Defendants engaged in any conduct to impede or frustrate timely service. See Spence, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80015, at *15 (fourth

factor). These factors thus militate against a discretionary extension as well. The final factor guiding the Court’s discretion examines whether the plaintiff is represented by counsel. See Spence, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80015, at *15. Plaintiffs here are all represented by counsel. And, in this context, “[e]ven when delay [in service] results from inadvertence of counsel, it need not be excused.” Petrucelli, 46 F.3d at 1307. This factor thus also weighs against a discretionary extension. Weighing all of the above factors, the Court is not persuaded that exercising its discretion to grant an extension to effectuate service on the AZ Defendants is warranted. Moreover, in addition to the factors counseling against an extension, the Court’s conclusion is further supported

by Plaintiffs’ failure to provide an explanation as to why they did not timely serve the AZ Defendants.6 c. Plaintiffs Have Not Shown that the AZ Defendants Waived their Defense to Untimely Service

Plaintiffs generally assert that the AZ Defendants waived any defense related to untimely service by virtue of their conduct in this MDL litigation. Plaintiffs argue that dismissal of their

6 The AZ Defendants also argue that because Plaintiffs did not address their reasons for untimely service (and instead relied chiefly on arguments concerning waiver), Plaintiffs’ reply to CMO 65 failed to comply with a court order, requiring dismissal of their cases on that independent basis. See, e.g., No. 19-cv-04209, ECF No. 10 at 6. The AZ Defendants cite certain Poulis factors to support this argument. Id. at 10. As explained above, the Court has considered Plaintiffs’ lack of an explanation in its discussion of Rule 4(m) and discretionary extensions. claims against the AZ Defendants is inappropriate in those cases where (1) the AZ Defendants filed a motion to dismiss without raising service; (2) the AZ Defendants either filed an answer without raising service or answered before service; or (3) the AZ Defendants manifested some intention to defend the case through the AZ Defendants’ conduct. See, e.g., Lucerne Resp. at § IV.B; Lopez Resp. at § IV.B. For the below reasons, the Court finds that the AZ Defendants have

not waived their defense to untimely service. The Court first turns to Plaintiffs’ argument that the AZ Defendants waived their defense to lack of service in those cases where the AZ Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for purported failure to comply with the tolling agreement without specifically raising the defense. However, the AZ Defendants did not raise service in their motions to dismiss because an alternate procedure, proposed and agreed upon by the parties, was set forth in a stipulated court order, with their defenses expressly preserved by CMO No. 7. See CMO No. 7, ECF No. 112, at 7 (“Defendants also reserve all rights to move to dismiss . . . under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule[] 12. Defendants shall only be permitted to file said motions to dismiss subject to leave of this Court.”).

CMO No. 7 thus expressly restricted defendants from moving to dismiss individual plaintiffs under Rule 12 absent leave of this Court. Indeed, the federal rules bar a defendant from later moving to dismiss for insufficient service of process only when the party “could have raised these objections in their [earlier] motion to dismiss the complaint.” Denkins v. William Penn Sch. Dist., No. 20- 02228, 2020 WL 5880132, at *3 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 2020); accord Wright & Miller, 5C Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civ. § 1391 (“If one or more of these defenses are omitted from the initial motion but were ‘then available’ to the movant, they are permanently lost.”). In filing their authorized dismissal motions pursuant to the tolling agreement and CMO No. 7, the AZ Defendants did not have leave to raise any other defense, including insufficient service as to a particular case. Having understood and agreed that such motions were to be deferred to a later date and with leave of the Court, it is not correct that the AZ Defendants, or any other defendant, waived their defense of service by failing to argue it in their motions to dismiss related to purported violations of the tolling agreement. Plaintiffs’ next argument—that the AZ Defendants waived service either by filing an

answer without raising service or by answering before service—is similarly unavailing. Plaintiffs assert that, as a general matter, waiver of service may occur where a defendant files an answer as its first responsive pleading and the answer fails to plead the defense. See, e.g., Lucerne Resp. at 7, 13. Accordingly, Plaintiffs argue that there are three potential scenarios where service has been waived by answer. First, Plaintiffs claim that in any case where the AZ Defendants filed a short form answer, service was waived because the short form answer simply incorporated the AZ Defendants’ initial long form answer. This, Plaintiffs maintain, is because the long form answer did not assert the defense of lack of service. See, e.g., id. at 14. Second, since a defendant’s notice of appearance in a specific case may serve as a short form answer, see Case Management Order

No. 27 (ECF No. 265), Plaintiffs contend that a notice of appearance after service is functionally the same as a short form answer—it incorporates the long form answer, which does not assert the defense of lack of service. Finally, Plaintiffs argue that a notice of appearance before service waives this defense under the terms of Case Management Order No. 27 for cases filed after September 24, 2018. See, e.g., Lucerne Resp. at 8; see also CMO No. 27, at § 1.A. As an initial matter, Plaintiffs’ individual submissions here do not assert that the AZ Defendants filed a short form answer in any of their cases, and the dockets confirm no such short form answers exist. See, e.g., Lucerne Resp., Ex. A; Lopez Resp., Ex. A; see generally No. 2:19- cv-04209; No. 2:18-cv-04494. Plaintiffs’ first argument is thus inapplicable to the cases listed in Exhibit A. Similarly, for the cases which are subject to CMO No. 27’s provision that a notice of appearance before service waives the defense (i.e., cases filed on or after September 24, 2018), the dockets clearly reflect that, to the extent the AZ Defendants filed a Notice of Appearance, it was not until after service was (untimely) effected on them and after the entry of CMO 65. This leaves the Plaintiffs whose individual submissions assert the AZ Defendants filed a notice of appearance

after service, which, they argue, waived the AZ Defendants’ untimely service defense because those notices incorporated the long form answer without further raising such a defense. However, as discussed above, at that point, the AZ Defendants had specifically “reserve[d] all rights to move to dismiss … under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule[] 12” when they (and Plaintiffs) agreed to CMO No. 7. CMO No. 7 at § G. Accordingly, the Court concludes that by filing a notice of appearance in a case in which the AZ Defendants had plainly reserved their right to challenge service, that notice of appearance did not negate the prior reservation and thereby waive the defense.7 Plaintiffs’ final argument on waiver is that the AZ Defendants waived their defense of

service through their conduct in the PPI litigation either as a whole or in individual cases. In support of their argument as to the AZ Defendants’ conduct in the litigation as a whole, Plaintiffs rely on In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation, No. 07-5944, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78902 (N.D. Cal. June 9, 2014). In that case, certain defendants raised their Rule 12(b)(5) defense to service in a consolidated motion to dismiss, but subsequently abandoned that 12(b)(5) motion in a later filing and then continued to participate in litigation for four years. The court found that under these circumstances those defendants had waived their defense of lack of service. Id. at *84-

7 The Court also notes that even if, contrary to the record, the AZ Defendants had filed a short form answer in any of the cases at issue here, the AZ Defendants’ reservation of rights from CMO No. 7 would mean that service was not waived. 88. The case is inapposite, however, as the AZ Defendants never previously raised—and subsequently abandoned—the defense of service in any of the cases identified here, and indeed was unable to without leave of the Court under CMO No. 7, as agreed to by the parties. Similarly, Plaintiffs’ reliance on In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (“MTBE”) Prods. Liab. Litig., 162 F. Supp. 3d 247 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 21, 2016), is misplaced. There, the plaintiff’s timely but defective

service on the defendant’s prior (and thus incorrect) address combined with the defendant’s actions in participating in the litigation (including attending MDL status conferences in which the particular case was discussed and waiting until after the statute of limitations had expired before moving to dismiss the complaint for lack of service) contributed to the plaintiff being “lulled into believing it had effectively served” the defendant. Id. at 250. The court thus found that the defendant’s conduct justified the court’s exercising its discretion to extend the time for service, but, importantly, the court did not find that the defendant had waived its defense. Id. at 48-50. Plaintiffs here have not asserted that they timely served the AZ Defendants at the wrong address or were otherwise lulled into thinking that they had in fact properly served the AZ Defendants

before CMO No. 65 was entered. Therefore, neither In re CRT nor In re MTBE justifies Plaintiffs’ argument. Additionally, Plaintiffs’ general response argues that the AZ Defendants waived their defense of service by participating in the litigation of individual cases, citing In re: Ethicon, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00758, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148765 (S.D.W.V. Oct. 27, 2016). But there, the defendants acknowledged receipt of a plaintiff profile form, requested additional information from the plaintiffs regarding their claims, and threatened to pursue a remedy in court if the plaintiff did not comply with their request. Id. at *6. By contrast, none of the Plaintiffs in the 1,181 cases herein claim that they received a deficiency letter related to their Plaintiff Fact Sheet, or that the AZ Defendants threatened to pursue a judicial remedy if the plaintiff did not cure the deficiency. In short, unlike in the Ethicon case, none of these Plaintiffs has demonstrated that the AZ Defendants have meaningfully participated in the litigation in their particular case. Further, the Court rejects Plaintiffs’ suggestion to impute the AZ Defendants’ conduct in defending themselves in cases not subject to CMO No. 65 to suggest that the AZ Defendants waived their defense of service of

process in the specific cases identified in Exhibit A hereto. Plaintiffs also assert that the AZ Defendants have waited too long to assert their defense of service. Plaintiffs rely on the Sixth Circuit’s decision in King v. Taylor; however, in that case, unlike here, the defendant actively litigated the case by, among other things, filing a joint Rule 26(f) report, participating in depositions, seeking to extend discovery deadlines, and joining in a status report in that particular case, and only moved to dismiss for lack of service at the summary judgment stage. King v. Taylor, 694 F.3d 650, 659-61 (6th Cir. 2012). Here, however, none of the 1,181 cases identified in Exhibit A is a Bellwether case or a Wave case and thus the AZ Defendants have not participated in discovery in the individual cases like the defendant in Taylor did. Further,

as noted previously, stipulated CMO No. 7 precluded the AZ Defendants from filing a motion to dismiss for lack of service without leave of the Court. IV. Conclusion CMO No. 65 required Plaintiffs to (1) show they timely served the AZ Defendants pursuant to Rule 4(m), (2) dismiss the AZ Defendants from their case, or (3) show cause why this Court should not dismiss the AZ Defendants from their cases. Plaintiffs whose cases are on Exhibit A have failed to meet their burden of demonstrating good cause for failure to comply with CMO No. 65 and effectuate timely service, and have failed to persuade the Court to exercise its discretion not to dismiss the AZ Defendants from their cases. Accordingly, this Court denies Plaintiffs’ requests for extensions and orders the AZ Defendants to be dismissed without prejudice from the cases identified in Exhibit A.® Accordingly, ITIS on this 24 _ day of April, 2023; ORDERED that the AZ Defendants shall be DISMISSED without prejudice from the cases identified in Exhibit A hereto. SO ORDERED. CA. ;

CLAIRE C. CECCHI, U.S.D.J.

To the extent Plaintiffs in the cases identified in Exhibit A hereto have raised in their briefing any arguments not expressly addressed herein, the Court has considered and rejected them. 15

1 Ronald Trent 2:18-cv-03769 2 Sunny Nielson 2:18-cv-03770 3 Valerie D. Bell 2:18-cv-03774 4 Antonio D. Davis 2:18-cv-03775 5 Misty Ashley 2:18-cv-03851 6 Carolyn Ellis 2:18-cv-03855 Fred Foscalina, As Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Betty Foscalina, 7 2:18-cv-03856 Deceased 8 Ronald Gardea 2:18-cv-03858 9 Paul Gann and Candance Gann 2:18-cv-03878 10 Alva Stewart 2:18-cv-03879 Shawney Tackett, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of David L. 11 2:18-cv-03880 Francis, Deceased 12 Nancy M. Crockett 2:18-cv-03883 13 Lynda D. McKibben 2:18-cv-03885 14 Leonore L. Sosa 2:18-cv-03886 15 Nathaniel McDaniel 2:18-cv-03888 16 Susan Cobb 2:18-cv-03889 17 Mary E. Berry 2:18-cv-03898 18 Kerrie Griffin 2:18-cv-04021 19 Charlene Coffey 2:18-cv-04024 20 Janet Gills 2:18-cv-04028 21 Debra Grigsby 2:18-cv-04031 22 Barbara Gibson 2:18-cv-04033 23 Steven Knox 2:18-cv-04036 24 Iva Good 2:18-cv-04038 25 Larry Rutheford and Diane E. Rutheford 2:18-cv-04039 26 Cynthia Gordon 2:18-cv-04042 27 Doris Cook 2:18-cv-04043 Alvin Cooper, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Peggy Cooper, 28 2:18-cv-04045 Deceased 29 Ricky L. Graham 2:18-cv-04047 30 Norman Kydd 2:18-cv-04048 31 Jeanette Gillespie 2:18-cv-04049 32 Joyce Gettys 2:18-cv-04052 33 Joyce Covington 2:18-cv-04053 34 Della I. Gregg 2:18-cv-04054 35 Theresa Landingham 2:18-cv-04057 36 Connie L. Croy 2:18-cv-04058 37 Christopher Cracolice and Martha Ann Cracolice 2:18-cv-04064 38 Terrisina Lawrence-Mason 2:18-cv-04065 39 Dianne Webber 2:18-cv-04069 40 Deborah Kirby and Thomas Kirby 2:18-cv-04073 Gaye Riggle, As Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Riggle, 41 2:18-cv-04076 Deceased 44 Nancy Ritterbush 2:18-cv-04084 45 Karen Reese 2:18-cv-04086 46 Willa Roberts 2:18-cv-04087 47 Tyrone Robinson 2:18-cv-04088 48 John Van Ness 2:18-cv-04090 49 Harry Hortsch 2:18-cv-04093 50 John Ortiz 2:18-cv-04095 51 Mike Moffat 2:18-cv-04139 52 Kristine S. Murff 2:18-cv-04145 53 Jeff Vider and Peggy Vider 2:18-cv-04151 54 Laurie T. Lum 2:18-cv-04159 55 Patrick Kirk and Rena Kirk 2:18-cv-04163 56 Barbara Corley 2:18-cv-04164 57 Danny Kinser 2:18-cv-04167 58 Betty L. Sanner 2:18-cv-04169 59 Valerie Taylor 2:18-cv-04173 60 Charles Ketcherside 2:18-cv-04178 61 Tia Hartmann 2:18-cv-04180 62 Grady Harris 2:18-cv-04181 63 Sue Ann Sanford 2:18-cv-04182 64 Daniel Sharp 2:18-cv-04184 65 Kathleen Johnson 2:18-cv-04190 66 Rachel Hogg 2:18-cv-04192 67 Barry Turner 2:18-cv-04193 68 Janice Givins 2:18-cv-04197 69 Gilda Saunders 2:18-cv-04198 70 Isaac S. Reid 2:18-cv-04200 71 Froncell Shannon 2:18-cv-04207 72 Mary A. Williams 2:18-cv-04208 73 Stephanie James and Bernard James 2:18-cv-04209 74 Rayshell Robinson 2:18-cv-04215 75 William Gilmore 2:18-cv-04216 76 Lorraine Smith 2:18-cv-04217 77 Deborah Harling 2:18-cv-04218 Samantha Hawksorth, As Proposed Representative of the Estate of David 78 2:18-cv-04220 L. Hawksworth, Deceased 79 Richard Hobbs 2:18-cv-04222 80 Michael Arnold 2:18-cv-04454 81 Linda Atkinson and Tommy Atkinson 2:18-cv-04459 82 Larry Brewer, Sr. 2:18-cv-04461 83 Sylvia Brooks 2:18-cv-04462 84 Herbert Banks and Myra Banks 2:18-cv-04463 85 Willien Holmes 2:18-cv-04464 86 Geneva Corbitt 2:18-cv-04465 87 Jerry Cameron 2:18-cv-04467 90 Jerry Campbell 2:18-cv-04473 91 Wendy Bess 2:18-cv-04474 92 Thelma Hampton 2:18-cv-04476 93 Donald Coble 2:18-cv-04478 94 Norman Holloway 2:18-cv-04481 95 Rozell Collins 2:18-cv-04482 96 Cassandra Howard 2:18-cv-04484 97 Kent Davis 2:18-cv-04486 98 Kathy Cook 2:18-cv-04487 99 Douglas Ivey 2:18-cv-04488 100 Sharren Crowell 2:18-cv-04489 101 Michael Lopez 2:18-cv-04494 102 Sandra Davis 2:18-cv-04496 103 Robert Parham, Jr. 2:18-cv-04497 104 Junior McDaniel 2:18-cv-04498 105 Climmie Gibbons 2:18-cv-04499 Teresa Harlen, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Jack R. Harlen, 106 2:18-cv-04500 Deceased 107 Herschel Merriett 2:18-cv-04503 108 Virginia Rackins 2:18-cv-04504 109 Otis Roberts 2:18-cv-04507 110 Henry Hess, Sr. 2:18-cv-04509 111 Charles Graham 2:18-cv-04510 112 Gail Semler 2:18-cv-04513 113 Laquanda Riggins 2:18-cv-04514 114 Patricia Simmons 2:18-cv-04515 115 Antonia Simmons 2:18-cv-04517 116 Jessie Martin 2:18-cv-04519 117 Mary Hankamer and Ed Hankamer 2:18-cv-04520 118 Christina Shubrick 2:18-cv-04521 119 Michael Morelock 2:18-cv-04522 120 Corliss Royal 2:18-cv-04523 121 Yvonne Sheers 2:18-cv-04524 122 Adeana Hardin 2:18-cv-04525 123 Brenda Dale 2:18-cv-04526 124 Brenda Smith-Capps 2:18-cv-04527 125 Kelly Smith 2:18-cv-04529 126 Frances Hardins 2:18-cv-04530 127 Ronald White 2:18-cv-04531 128 Delma Comer 2:18-cv-04532 129 Barbara Sapp-Greene 2:18-cv-04533 130 Mary Haynes 2:18-cv-04535 131 Sandra Young 2:18-cv-04536 132 Paul E. Wheeler 2:18-cv-04537 133 Betty Head 2:18-cv-04538 136 Terria Wallace-Terrell 2:18-cv-04544 137 Philip Sawyer 2:18-cv-04545 138 Gary Nunez 2:18-cv-04614 139 Rhea Smith 2:18-cv-04615 140 Dwayne Fails 2:18-cv-04618 141 Daniel Opp 2:18-cv-04622 142 Tina Bowman 2:18-cv-04623 143 Ted Smith 2:18-cv-04624 144 Betty Brumfield 2:18-cv-04626 145 Walter Hammond and Adah Kennon 2:18-cv-04628 146 Alvin Stafford 2:18-cv-04629 147 Edward Chicarelli, Sr. 2:18-cv-04631 148 Gregory Chicarelli 2:18-cv-04635 149 Valerie Jones 2:18-cv-04636 150 John Sydnor 2:18-cv-04637 151 Jacqueline Blake 2:18-cv-04638 152 Jason Kellems 2:18-cv-04639 153 Barbara Johnson 2:18-cv-04640 154 William E. Taulbee 2:18-cv-04646 155 James Thornhill 2:18-cv-04651 156 Keith Likes 2:18-cv-04652 157 Mark Pickens 2:18-cv-04657 158 Peggy Waldron 2:18-cv-04658 159 Dawn Lockett 2:18-cv-04659 160 Carolyn Polly 2:18-cv-04660 161 Jerry Queen 2:18-cv-04661 162 Bobbie Walker 2:18-cv-04663 163 Eugenia Long 2:18-cv-04664 164 Joaquin Ramos and Linda Ramos 2:18-cv-04665 165 Margaret Manly 2:18-cv-04667 166 Janie Washington 2:18-cv-04669 167 Dena Sinnett 2:18-cv-04671 168 Brian Boyd 2:18-cv-04672 Rachedia Ross, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Kelli Prevo, 169 2:18-cv-04681 Deceased 170 Thelma Mason 2:18-cv-04684 171 Brenda Read 2:18-cv-04687 172 Julie Redderson 2:18-cv-04690 173 Harvey Chavez 2:18-cv-04695 174 Patricia J Smith 2:18-cv-04696 175 Judith Turner 2:18-cv-04697 176 Irma Santana 2:18-cv-04698 177 Michael Chivers 2:18-cv-04699 178 Sharon Turner 2:18-cv-04700 179 Paula Saul 2:18-cv-04703 182 Wilma Wilson 2:18-cv-04710 183 Amoikon Ngouan 2:18-cv-05032 184 Roger Phillips and Margaret Phillips 2:18-cv-05034 185 Erika Short 2:18-cv-05035 186 Joseph Stephenson 2:18-cv-05036 187 Linda Swinford-Cooksey 2:18-cv-05037 188 Elizabeth Talton 2:18-cv-05039 189 Wanda Thomas 2:18-cv-05040 190 Guy Thomas 2:18-cv-05043 191 Sharon Thornhill 2:18-cv-05044 192 Isaiah Thomas 2:18-cv-05045 193 Patricia Vineyard 2:18-cv-05046 194 Donna Wicker 2:18-cv-05048 195 Michael Yardrough 2:18-cv-05050 196 Perry Trowbridge 2:18-cv-05051 197 Kathy Baumgartner 2:18-cv-05052 198 Keith Turner 2:18-cv-05053 199 Betty Dodd 2:18-cv-05054 200 Lorenzo Valenzuela 2:18-cv-05055 201 Maria Valenzuela 2:18-cv-05057 202 Patrika Vestal 2:18-cv-05059 203 Crystal Cartier 2:18-cv-05063 204 Jerry Messer 2:18-cv-05067 205 John Muncy 2:18-cv-05071 206 Linda Williams 2:18-cv-05075 207 Patricia Younger 2:18-cv-05078 208 Michael Worthen 2:18-cv-05079 209 Robert Dryden 2:18-cv-05081 210 Ricky Thomas 2:18-cv-05082 211 Christina Ward 2:18-cv-05083 212 Charla Mogg 2:18-cv-05084 213 Tommy Huff, Sr. 2:18-cv-05086 214 Renee Martinez 2:18-cv-05128 215 Ramon Barrios 2:18-cv-05129 216 Stephen Mitchell 2:18-cv-05130 217 Allen Murrow 2:18-cv-05132 218 Jerry Franklin 2:18-cv-05133 219 Myra McAllister 2:18-cv-05134 220 Marilyn McCallister 2:18-cv-05136 221 Anthony Taormina 2:18-cv-05137 222 Charles Smith 2:18-cv-05138 223 Donnie Mink 2:18-cv-05140 224 Melody Nequette 2:18-cv-05141 225 Darlene Farr 2:18-cv-05143 226 Catherine Morton-Davis 2:18-cv-05144 229 Phillip Harris and Denise Harris 2:18-cv-05150 Hermon McNac, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Lillie M. 230 2:18-cv-05152 Butler, Deceased 231 Glenda Mays 2:18-cv-05153 232 Kathryn Caban 2:18-cv-05155 233 Christine Scott 2:18-cv-05158 234 Crystal Henson 2:18-cv-05160 235 David McMillen 2:18-cv-05161 236 Clara Singleton 2:18-cv-05162 237 Timothy Carter 2:18-cv-05163 238 Barbara Lambert and Paul Lambert 2:18-cv-05164 239 Phillip Tavegia 2:18-cv-05165 240 Sarah Mitchell 2:18-cv-05166 241 Charlotte Means 2:18-cv-05167 242 Richard Moran 2:18-cv-05170 243 Frederick Nickerson 2:18-cv-05171 244 Diane Murphy 2:18-cv-05174 245 Glenn Nemecek 2:18-cv-05177 246 Margorie Walker 2:18-cv-05178 247 Ruth Williamson 2:18-cv-05179 248 Harold E. Rakestraw 2:18-cv-05183 249 Linda Smith 2:18-cv-05186 250 Caroline Weatherton 2:18-cv-05189 251 Janie Wright 2:18-cv-05190 252 Marisha Miller 2:18-cv-05191 253 Melinda McMillen and Lawrence R. McMillen 2:18-cv-05194 254 Louanna Dunlap 2:18-cv-05195 255 Nancy Miller 2:18-cv-05197 256 George Hansen 2:18-cv-05198 257 Dwight Smith 2:18-cv-05202 258 Freddie Johnson 2:18-cv-05205 259 Rebecca Johnston 2:18-cv-05206 260 Alfred Vargas 2:18-cv-05207 261 Deanna Lacy 2:18-cv-05208 262 Terry Rasmussen 2:18-cv-05209 263 Barbara Manuel 2:18-cv-05212 264 Norma Williams 2:18-cv-05213 265 Teresa Byers 2:18-cv-05431 266 Adrian Nagy 2:18-cv-05432 267 Anthony Richardson 2:18-cv-05434 268 Rosemary Lehr 2:18-cv-05437 269 Donald Gibson 2:18-cv-05438 270 Lindell Shelby 2:18-cv-05439 271 Susan Miller 2:18-cv-05441 272 William Wade 2:18-cv-05449 275 Darrell Craw 2:18-cv-05454 276 Gerald Whatley 2:18-cv-05455 277 Joseph Cervantes 2:18-cv-05456 278 Sherry Hunt 2:18-cv-05457 279 Kit Middleton 2:18-cv-05461 280 Sandra Garrett 2:18-cv-05463 281 Hilda Johnson 2:18-cv-05464 282 Tony Hernandez 2:18-cv-05472 283 Bryan Swanson 2:18-cv-05476 284 Pamela Clark 2:18-cv-05478 285 Melvin Stubbs 2:18-cv-05479 286 Brett Timothy 2:18-cv-05481 287 Linda M. Williams 2:18-cv-05482 288 Cecelia Clipper 2:18-cv-05483 289 Jennifer Wolfe 2:18-cv-05485 290 Catherine Farrell 2:18-cv-05487 291 Sharon Powers 2:18-cv-05488 292 Arthur Warshawsky 2:18-cv-05490 293 Martha Burns 2:18-cv-05495 294 Gary Robertson 2:18-cv-05499 295 Kyle Rose 2:18-cv-05500 296 Margie Jennings 2:18-cv-05501 Rickey Crihfield, As Proposed Representative of the Estate of Miki L. 297 2:18-cv-05502 Crihfield, deceased 298 Jeffrey Jones 2:18-cv-05504 299 Deborah Lee 2:18-cv-05507 300 Ellen Moritt 2:18-cv-05509 301 Burma Sizemore 2:18-cv-05511 302 Bob Hoover 2:18-cv-05513 303 Carmen Stevens 2:18-cv-05516 304 Samantha Lawson 2:18-cv-05520 Shirley Teel, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Ezra C. Teel, 305 2:18-cv-05521 Deceased 306 Margie Delauder 2:18-cv-05526 307 Brenda Bunch 2:18-cv-05942 308 Richard Cannon 2:18-cv-05947 309 Melissa Curry 2:18-cv-05952 310 Brenda Dye 2:18-cv-05956 311 Sheryl Gerald 2:18-cv-05959 312 Cedric Florence 2:18-cv-05960 313 Dennis Lane 2:18-cv-05962 314 Marsha Layman 2:18-cv-05964 315 Joyce Noble 2:18-cv-05968 316 Samantha Riddle 2:18-cv-05971 317 Richard Slate 2:18-cv-05973 319 Deceased 2:18-cv-05976 320 William Taylor 2:18-cv-05977 321 Janet Washington 2:18-cv-05978 322 George Hawkins 2:18-cv-05980 323 Dana Wilson 2:18-cv-05982 324 Michael Longacre 2:18-cv-05988 325 Linda Martin 2:18-cv-05989 326 Debra O'Neal 2:18-cv-05993 327 Elnora Pope 2:18-cv-05995 328 Susan Reedy 2:18-cv-05996 329 Debbie Reynolds 2:18-cv-05997 330 Lacy Skinner 2:18-cv-06000 331 Linda Wilson 2:18-cv-06002 332 Brenda Young 2:18-cv-06003 333 Kathryn Anderson 2:18-cv-06134 334 Larry Basham and Linda Basham 2:18-cv-06138 335 Mary Hollander 2:18-cv-06148 336 Lance Faulkner 2:18-cv-06154 337 Christina Ford 2:18-cv-06157 338 Ruby Brake 2:18-cv-06161 339 Sharon Reid 2:18-cv-06164 340 Jimmy Brown 2:18-cv-06165 341 Bartholomew Gaiera and Karen Gaiera 2:18-cv-06166 342 Gregry Russell 2:18-cv-06169 343 Kathlene Brown 2:18-cv-06171 344 Sarah Brown 2:18-cv-06175 345 Sonjia Short 2:18-cv-06177 346 Donald Silas 2:18-cv-06180 347 Rita Bentley 2:18-cv-06184 348 Rebecca Harrington 2:18-cv-06196 349 Linda Buie 2:18-cv-06198 350 Patricia Hasty 2:18-cv-06202 351 John Copp 2:18-cv-06204 352 Sherry Davis 2:18-cv-06206 353 Garry Jackson 2:18-cv-06207 354 Richard Jackson and Judy Fontenot 2:18-cv-06214 355 John Whatley 2:18-cv-06216 356 Eugene Johnson 2:18-cv-06222 357 Beverly Elgan 2:18-cv-06223 358 Susan Downs 2:18-cv-06224 359 Cardell Woodard 2:18-cv-06225 360 Sharon Farris 2:18-cv-06227 361 Junita Horn 2:18-cv-06231 362 Bonnie Mize 2:18-cv-06232 363 Jackie Knight 2:18-cv-06233 366 Richard Leonard 2:18-cv-06244 367 Karla Lee 2:18-cv-06245 368 Theodore Logan, Jr. 2:18-cv-06250 369 Sonja Prince 2:18-cv-06251 370 Belinda Holland 2:18-cv-06253 371 Tunya Lowe 2:18-cv-06256 372 Steve Thompson 2:18-cv-06260 373 Dorothy Van Horn 2:18-cv-06264 374 Sandra Walling 2:18-cv-06268 375 Marlene McIntyre 2:18-cv-06270 376 Michael Wetselline 2:18-cv-06271 377 Patina Johnson 2:18-cv-06274 378 Billy Largen and Donna Brown 2:18-cv-06278 379 Lillian Paxton 2:18-cv-06284 380 Bob Russom 2:18-cv-06288 Susan White, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Eugene 381 2:18-cv-06432 Kujawski, Deceased 382 Johnny Daniels 2:18-cv-06440 383 Emilee Palmer and Michael D. Palmer 2:18-cv-06449 Mary Nordby, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Joan Jackson, 384 2:18-cv-06450 Deceased 385 Tina Thornburg 2:18-cv-06456 386 Ennis Dunning 2:18-cv-06460 Marsha Graham, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Gary 387 2:18-cv-06467 Graham, Deceased 388 Kevin Harper 2:18-cv-06473 Travis Charlton, As Proposed Representative of the Estate of Cynthia 389 2:18-cv-06476 Halbert, Deceased 390 Ima Young and Hollis Young-Wheely 2:18-cv-06480 Lesa Honn, Individually and as Proposed Representative of the Estate of 391 2:18-cv-06481 Leonard Honn, Deceased Teresa Alvarez, Individually and as Proposed Representative of the Estate 392 2:18-cv-06484 of Thomas Alvarez, Deceased Rosie Alvarez, Individually and as Proposed Representative of the Estate of 393 2:18-cv-06488 Urbano Alvarez, Deceased Nina Fernandez, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Sanra Nobil, 394 2:18-cv-06497 Deceased 395 Bradley Olson and Shirley Olson 2:18-cv-06498 Bernice Haley, Individually and as Proposed Representative of the Estate 396 2:18-cv-06504 of Dennis Ray Haley, Deceased Jerry Blosser, Individually and as Proposed Representative of the Estate of 397 2:18-cv-06515 Wanda Blosser, Deceased 398 Norma Stillwagoner 2:18-cv-06520 Debbie Edgell, Individually and as Proposed Representative of the Estate 399 2:18-cv-06521 of Jackie Edgell, Deceased 400 of Larry Keenan, Deceased 2:18-cv-06522 Shirley Morton, Individually and as Proposed Representative of the Estate 401 2:18-cv-06527 of Delbert P Morton Sr., Deceased James McDade, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Laverne 402 2:18-cv-06528 McDade, Deceased Gina Zerby, Individually and as the Proposed Representative of Michael 403 2:18-cv-06532 Zerby, Deceased Lillian Paxton, Individually and as Proposed Representatie of the Estate of 404 2:18-cv-06533 John Paxton, Deceased 405 Michelle Wilson 2:18-cv-06540 Rita Johnson, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Lessie Tharpe, 406 2:18-cv-06549 Deceased Emily Knotts, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Cheryl Stefenel, 407 2:18-cv-06552 Deceased 408 William Cavanaugh and Margaret Cavanaugh 2:18-cv-06791 409 Julie Cross 2:18-cv-06800 410 Jacquelyn Booker 2:18-cv-06834 411 Dianne Caldwell 2:18-cv-06846 412 Brenda Cameron 2:18-cv-06854 Leona Collins, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 413 2:18-cv-06869 Deniese Collins, Deceased 414 Patrick Connors 2:18-cv-06876 415 Larry Ludwick 2:18-cv-06937 416 Gladys Maddox 2:18-cv-06939 417 Frank Rendon 2:18-cv-06940 418 Johnnie Oliver 2:18-cv-06947 Charles Jones, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Victoria Jones, 419 2:18-cv-06952 Deceased 420 John Cole 2:18-cv-06962 421 Helen Robinson 2:18-cv-06963 Dorothy Alegria, As the Representative of the Estate of Edwin Alegria, 422 2:18-cv-06966 deceased 423 Charles Howard 2:18-cv-06986 424 Luvern Purnell 2:18-cv-06997 425 Amy Qualles 2:18-cv-07001 426 Teresa Hill-Ibrahim 2:18-cv-07005 427 Barbara Burger 2:18-cv-07027 428 Kathy Lockhart 2:18-cv-07032 429 Dionna McGairk 2:18-cv-07043 430 Vertis Kellam 2:18-cv-07048 Judy Bradshaw, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 431 2:18-cv-07049 Jimmy Bradshaw, Deceased Richard Oyerbides, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 432 2:18-cv-07052 Rebecca Mobley, Deceased 433 Shane Kilgore 2:18-cv-07057 436 Virginia Boyd 2:18-cv-07090 437 Carl Evans Jr. and Carolyn Evans 2:18-cv-07106 438 Herman Firmin 2:18-cv-07110 439 Cornelius Bentley Sr. 2:18-cv-07112 440 Herbert Johnson 2:18-cv-07130 Joan Stoveken, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Gay 441 2:18-cv-07137 Stoveken, Deceased Angela Spicer, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 442 2:18-cv-07148 James Spicer, Deceased Amanda Turner, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 443 2:18-cv-07153 Ronald Turner, Deceased 444 Christopher Crittenden 2:18-cv-07154 Jessie Darby, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 445 2:18-cv-07156 Donnie Darby, Deceased 446 Malissa Wilson 2:18-cv-07170 447 Erick Barnes 2:18-cv-07187 448 John Norton 2:18-cv-07192 449 Tammy Perry 2:18-cv-07194 450 Brenda Fletcher 2:18-cv-07203 451 Nancy Esque 2:18-cv-07208 452 Kathleen King 2:18-cv-07228 453 Robert Brown 2:18-cv-07234 Diane McGee, individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Kevin 454 2:18-cv-07239 McGee, Deceased 455 Mary Laffoon 2:18-cv-07243 456 George Gale 2:18-cv-07267 457 Clarence Abrams 2:18-cv-07270 458 Bonnie Apple 2:18-cv-07287 459 Helen Cannon 2:18-cv-07302 460 Sharon Ayers-Johnson 2:18-cv-07313 Olivia Hogan, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 461 2:18-cv-07319 Maggie Harrison, Deceased 462 Brenda Bell 2:18-cv-07333 463 Thomas Russo 2:18-cv-07340 464 Forest Moore 2:18-cv-07351 Paul Lue, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Hyacinth 465 2:18-cv-07352 Johnson, Deceased Ernestine Mays-Mitchell, Individually and as the Representative of the 466 2:18-cv-07365 Estate of Ernest Mays, Deceased 467 Clarence Rich 2:18-cv-07373 468 Cynthia Stapleton 2:18-cv-07381 469 Alice Williams 2:18-cv-07390 470 Birdie Woods 2:18-cv-07438 471 Lynette Tucker 2:18-cv-07441 Mary Murphy, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 472 2:18-cv-07450 474 Douglas Dennison 2:18-cv-07488 475 Kathleen White 2:18-cv-07501 476 Shirley Newsome 2:18-cv-07503 477 Lloyd Fleenor 2:18-cv-07515 Jamie Morgan, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 478 2:18-cv-07526 Bernard Morgan, Deceased 479 Cecelia Roberts 2:18-cv-07534 480 Tammy Taylor 2:18-cv-07538 481 Bessie Madden 2:18-cv-07541 Frank Tropier, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Irene 482 2:18-cv-07544 Tropier, Deceased Deborah King, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Eva 483 2:18-cv-07550 Manley, Deceased 484 Curtis Blankenship 2:18-cv-07553 485 Betty Apellido 2:18-cv-07557 486 Ora Groves 2:18-cv-07590 487 Gloria Dietrich 2:18-cv-07592 488 Robin Eden 2:18-cv-07613 489 Walker Howell 2:18-cv-07616 490 Stephanie Ralston-Bailey 2:18-cv-07617 491 Laura Richie 2:18-cv-07622 492 Regina Salisbury 2:18-cv-07632 493 Marlene Hatfield 2:18-cv-07639 494 Caren Singer 2:18-cv-07640 495 Randall Morton 2:18-cv-07662 496 Sharon Nali 2:18-cv-07667 497 Irvin Albright 2:18-cv-07669 Mary Ann Negrete, individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 498 2:18-cv-07671 Hiram Negrete, Deceased William Solis, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Aura 499 2:18-cv-07688 Burgos, Deceased 500 Ronald Klinenberg 2:18-cv-07706 Linda Weller, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 501 2:18-cv-07707 Marjorie Beecher, Deceased 502 Luis Nesta 2:18-cv-07708 503 Lorraine Turco 2:18-cv-07713 504 Delorise Marks 2:18-cv-07716 Mildred Hernandez, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 505 2:18-cv-07724 Charles Varela, Deceased 506 Hazel Phillips 2:18-cv-07748 Elvia Quiroga, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 507 2:18-cv-07751 Pedro Quiroga, Deceased 508 Tracie Powers 2:18-cv-07756 Mary Rivali, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Robert 509 2:18-cv-07760 Rivali, Deceased 511 Evelyn Sullivan, Deceased 2:18-cv-07781 512 Bernadine Hardie 2:18-cv-07795 513 Peter Guerrero 2:18-cv-07796 514 Delisha Thomas 2:18-cv-07801 515 Joel Neidlinger 2:18-cv-07833 516 Deanna Shafer 2:18-cv-07851 517 Michael Barnett 2:19-cv-01055 Susan Hageman, As Proposed Representative of the Estate of Jack 518 2:19-cv-01584 Hageman, Deceased 519 Dennis Kendall 2:19-cv-01668 520 Quintin Dennis 2:19-cv-01813 521 Ruth Dobson 2:19-cv-01849 522 Martha Griffith 2:19-cv-01853 523 William Hall 2:19-cv-01859 524 Gloria Haywood 2:19-cv-01881 525 James Amato 2:19-cv-01883 526 Ruth Hurd 2:19-cv-01887 527 Eric Hurwitz 2:19-cv-01889 528 Patricia Joppien 2:19-cv-01897 529 Paul Jozwiak 2:19-cv-01902 530 Ethel Birch 2:19-cv-01914 531 Michele Blomont 2:19-cv-01923 532 George Bonis 2:19-cv-01931 533 Raymond Bryant 2:19-cv-01939 534 John Bottoms 2:19-cv-01945 535 Cindy Campbell 2:19-cv-01948 536 Colleen Cantwell 2:19-cv-01965 Janis Carlton, Individually and as the Representative fo the Estate of 537 2:19-cv-01976 Arland Carlton Jr., Deceased 538 Gladys Carpenter 2:19-cv-01981 539 Pete Caudillo 2:19-cv-01990 540 Brandon Cole 2:19-cv-02004 541 Robert Crenshaw 2:19-cv-02011 542 Wanda Crager 2:19-cv-02012 543 Jason Daniels 2:19-cv-02015 544 Linda McMillen 2:19-cv-02035 545 Odessa Mitchell 2:19-cv-02040 546 Patricia Mitchell 2:19-cv-02048 547 Charles Newsom 2:19-cv-02050 548 Orestes Diaz 2:19-cv-02059 549 Helmut Otto 2:19-cv-02061 550 Charlotte Edgar 2:19-cv-02074 Carey Bowie, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Henry 551 2:19-cv-02086 Bowie, Deceased 552 William Elias 2:19-cv-02089 554 Margarita Cantu, Deceased 2:19-cv-02104 555 Juanita Landers 2:19-cv-02127 556 Johnny Fritts 2:19-cv-02128 557 Karen Gaines 2:19-cv-02136 Brenda McCurdy, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 558 2:19-cv-02143 Rickey McCurdy, Deceased 559 Gloria Hernandez 2:19-cv-02147 Cynthia McDonald, As the representative of the Estate of Helen 560 2:19-cv-02157 McDonald, deceased 561 Bridgette Long 2:19-cv-02159 Nettie Overton, individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 562 2:19-cv-02174 Charlie Overton, Deceased 563 Glenda Long 2:19-cv-02175 564 Melissa Olson 2:19-cv-02204 565 Sandra Pannell 2:19-cv-02246 566 Priscille Parent 2:19-cv-02261 567 Lucretia Peavy 2:19-cv-02275 568 Mabel Perry 2:19-cv-02318 569 Glenna Pool 2:19-cv-02335 570 Debra Primrose 2:19-cv-02356 Margaret Pryor, As the Representative of the Estate of Keith Pryor, 571 2:19-cv-02367 deceased 572 Joyce Sheffield 2:19-cv-02377 573 Terry Sheffield 2:19-cv-02386 Esther Rangel, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 574 2:19-cv-02404 Armando Rangel, Deceased 575 Henry Shuster 2:19-cv-02445 576 John Silva 2:19-cv-02454 577 Lionel Smith 2:19-cv-02464 578 Linda Stockwell 2:19-cv-02475 579 Diane Watkins 2:19-cv-02484 580 James Williams 2:19-cv-02487 581 Charles Wiley 2:19-cv-02493 582 Darwin Valentine 2:19-cv-02547 583 Linda Wood 2:19-cv-02562 Susan Lynn Wright, Individually and as the Representatie of the Estate of 584 2:19-cv-02577 Tabitha Wright, Deceased 585 Denise Brown 2:19-cv-02581 586 Donna Wooten 2:19-cv-02586 587 Andra Henderson 2:19-cv-02743 588 Darryl Herod 2:19-cv-02748 589 Michael Prilla 2:19-cv-02955 590 John Choyce 2:19-cv-02988 Cheryl Adams, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Belle Collins, 591 2:19-cv-02996 Deceased 594 Carla Comer 2:19-cv-03073 595 Leota Conrad 2:19-cv-03075 596 John Covell 2:19-cv-03078 597 Cynthia Etheridge 2:19-cv-03118 598 Nancy Fennell 2:19-cv-03132 599 Nellie Ferguson 2:19-cv-03137 600 Treva Graves 2:19-cv-03142 601 Terry Haynes 2:19-cv-03163 602 Bertha Gable 2:19-cv-03165 603 Georgia Jackson-Wade 2:19-cv-03193 604 Rhonda Gomez 2:19-cv-03217 605 Kevin Goss 2:19-cv-03252 606 Paula Jones 2:19-cv-03256 607 Merle Kirkland 2:19-cv-03272 608 Mark Lacombe 2:19-cv-03277 609 Dennis Lacy 2:19-cv-03284 610 Lisa Peters 2:19-cv-03312 611 Shelia Holmes 2:19-cv-03327 612 Edward Miller 2:19-cv-03340 613 Brandon Hugghins 2:19-cv-03366 614 Sylvia Perez 2:19-cv-03368 615 Linda Phillips 2:19-cv-03376 616 Michelle Inman 2:19-cv-03391 617 Charlene Jackson 2:19-cv-03415 618 Brenda Ridyolph 2:19-cv-03419 619 Paula Jackson 2:19-cv-03433 620 Sandi Robinson 2:19-cv-03435 621 Wanda Rogers 2:19-cv-03445 622 Barbara Steele 2:19-cv-03458 623 Bettye Stockton 2:19-cv-03467 624 Erick Joe 2:19-cv-03476 625 Nancy Sullivan 2:19-cv-03477 626 Shirley Swope 2:19-cv-03480 627 Cynthia Tucker 2:19-cv-03489 628 Shirlie Johnson 2:19-cv-03494 629 Dante Wilder 2:19-cv-03508 630 Moses Willmore 2:19-cv-03520 631 Lidia Yanez 2:19-cv-03524 632 Ronald E. Ker 2:19-cv-03528 Karen Collins, As proposed representative of the Estate of Charles Collins, 633 2:19-cv-03537 deceased 634 Carolyn Coule and Jerome Coule 2:19-cv-03544 635 Joel Kight 2:19-cv-03545 636 Rosetta Cunningham 2:19-cv-03553 637 Helen Davis 2:19-cv-03561 Rickie Swonger, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Joyce Boyer, 640 2:19-cv-03596 Deceased 641 Carl Brewer, Jr. 2:19-cv-03605 Lowanda Ford, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of William Ford, 642 2:19-cv-03612 Deceased 643 Phillip Cottle 2:19-cv-03618 644 Linda Fresquez 2:19-cv-03624 645 Timothy Buzard 2:19-cv-03626 646 Diana Greathouse 2:19-cv-03633 Lena Turknett, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Cecilia Gaines, 647 2:19-cv-03636 Deceased 648 Suzanne Coleman-Cunningham 2:19-cv-03638 649 Maria Garcia 2:19-cv-03644 Betty Hunter, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 650 2:19-cv-03645 Thomas Hunter, Deceased 651 Noreen Davis-Xanthis 2:19-cv-03646 652 Harrison Gift, III 2:19-cv-03651 653 Juanita Mekwuye 2:19-cv-03652 654 Lucille Dunson 2:19-cv-03661 655 Bernadette Green 2:19-cv-03662 656 Barbara Zajack 2:19-cv-03663 657 Ruthie Griffin 2:19-cv-03670 658 Melba Fabel 2:19-cv-03671 659 Jennifer Collins 2:19-cv-03679 660 Cecile Fichtner 2:19-cv-03681 661 Melissa Harris 2:19-cv-03684 662 Tracy Henderson 2:19-cv-03685 663 Linwood Flemister 2:19-cv-03686 664 Kathlene Henson and Ernest Henson 2:19-cv-03687 665 Elizabeth Flournoy 2:19-cv-03697 666 Cathleen James 2:19-cv-03707 667 James Franklin, Sr. 2:19-cv-03711 Cyndi Mazza, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Josephine 668 2:19-cv-03716 Kempf, Deceased 669 Cynthia Lawhorn 2:19-cv-03739 670 Adeline Henderson 2:19-cv-03769 671 Linda Martinez 2:19-cv-03777 672 Lynell Johnson 2:19-cv-03784 673 Michael Jones 2:19-cv-03806 674 Cara Kreider 2:19-cv-03817 675 Stephen McNeill 2:19-cv-03823 676 Richard Lombardo 2:19-cv-03826 677 Linda Metcalf 2:19-cv-03836 678 Matilde Lopez 2:19-cv-03839 679 Kathleen Mirarchi 2:19-cv-03841 Melissa Konarski, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 682 2:19-cv-03869 Pamela Zaccardi, Deceased 683 Patty Anderson 2:19-cv-03889 684 Kevin Takacs 2:19-cv-03921 685 Patricia E. Thomas 2:19-cv-03980 686 Brandon Ward 2:19-cv-03987 687 Darren Williams 2:19-cv-04012 688 Belinda Laird 2:19-cv-04031 689 Robert Williams 2:19-cv-04036 690 Gaye Young 2:19-cv-04050 691 Julie Long 2:19-cv-04094 692 Fidencio Lopez 2:19-cv-04111 693 Anita Loudy 2:19-cv-04113 694 Harold Martin 2:19-cv-04125 695 Fernando Martinez, Jr. 2:19-cv-04130 696 Sandra Detherage 2:19-cv-04133 697 Carol Rosenblum 2:19-cv-04146 698 Linda Barnett 2:19-cv-04152 Bernice Elkins, As the Representative of the Estate of Chilles Elkins, 699 2:19-cv-04161 Deceased 700 Susan Payne 2:19-cv-04162 701 Keith Ellery 2:19-cv-04166 702 Kerry Bland 2:19-cv-04178 703 Denise Garrette 2:19-cv-04188 704 Josette Schaffer 2:19-cv-04192 705 Barbara Grant 2:19-cv-04197 706 Lynn Seabrook 2:19-cv-04198 707 Mary C. Smith 2:19-cv-04202 John Danso, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Vickie 708 2:19-cv-04204 Danso, Deceased 709 Rachel Smith 2:19-cv-04207 710 Lawrence Lucerne 2:19-cv-04209 711 Rickey E. Vice 2:19-cv-04211 712 Sandra Mason 2:19-cv-04218 713 Cheryl Woody 2:19-cv-04223 714 Beverly McCaleb 2:19-cv-04224 Veda McDonald-Rhodes, Individually and as the Representative of the 715 2:19-cv-04228 Estate of Andre McDonald, Deceased 716 Joanne Smith 2:19-cv-04234 717 Lee Spaulding 2:19-cv-04238 718 Diane Wood 2:19-cv-04242 719 Marvin Edwards 2:19-cv-04248 720 John Mangum 2:19-cv-04263 721 Robert McKim 2:19-cv-04266 722 Paul Shrode 2:19-cv-04267 723 Nicholson, Deceased 2:19-cv-04276 724 Robert C. Lopez 2:19-cv-04342 725 Mary Burchett 2:19-cv-04470 726 Greg Cadjew 2:19-cv-04473 727 Anabel Campbell 2:19-cv-04485 728 Clarice Boutin 2:19-cv-04486 729 Joanna E. Campbell 2:19-cv-04492 730 Quinten W. Bowen 2:19-cv-04497 731 Michael Bowen 2:19-cv-04503 732 Cathleen A. Brooks 2:19-cv-04504 733 Don Burleson-Castillo 2:19-cv-04505 734 Terri L. Banfield 2:19-cv-04506 735 Lisa Brookshire 2:19-cv-04510 736 Melinda J. Burns 2:19-cv-04515 737 Catherine Antwine 2:19-cv-04516 738 Roy D. Burress 2:19-cv-04517 739 Jackie L. Brown 2:19-cv-04518 740 Joseph A. Archer 2:19-cv-04519 741 Margie T. Bannister 2:19-cv-04528 742 Danny Asti 2:19-cv-04534 743 Leta Bannon 2:19-cv-04535 744 Janice Weibley, on behalf of Elizabeth L. Boyd 2:19-cv-04537 745 Cassandra Bell 2:19-cv-04548 746 Debra Bramblett 2:19-cv-04561 747 Douglas Ball 2:19-cv-04572 748 Laquiche L. Benjamin 2:19-cv-04573 749 Brent Bregan 2:19-cv-04574 750 Sharon L. Bennett 2:19-cv-04580 751 Charita R. Brown 2:19-cv-04586 752 Johnny Brown 2:19-cv-04592 753 Todd Brown 2:19-cv-04595 754 Yvonne Abrams 2:19-cv-04617 755 Lisa D. Binder 2:19-cv-04628 756 Ricky W. Barley 2:19-cv-04629 757 Candy J. Bryant 2:19-cv-04630 758 Tammie Y. Cheatham 2:19-cv-04634 759 Charles A. Biondillo 2:19-cv-04643 760 Dennis Bunch 2:19-cv-04650 761 Sherman Bunnell 2:19-cv-04653 762 Ruth Cassidy 2:19-cv-04664 763 Lisa Jo Albright 2:19-cv-04674 764 Brian D. Alexander 2:19-cv-04680 765 Josephine Basey 2:19-cv-04681 766 Damisha L. Bishop 2:19-cv-04684 767 Joe Alfieri 2:19-cv-04690 770 Sylvia J. Cotton 2:19-cv-04709 771 Gerald E. Coyle 2:19-cv-04719 772 Alice Baxter 2:19-cv-04722 773 Joe Bean 2:19-cv-04730 774 Jackie Crawford 2:19-cv-04734 775 Ruth V. Cleveland 2:19-cv-04735 Anna Gonzalez, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Beatrice Ceja, 776 2:19-cv-04750 Deceased 777 Derrick A. Cloud 2:19-cv-04756 778 Sharon Brewer 2:19-cv-04761 779 Etta M. Brewer 2:19-cv-04762 780 Tiena Britt 2:19-cv-04773 781 Joe Dehart 2:19-cv-04776 782 Jose Deleon 2:19-cv-04781 783 Twila M. Dillon 2:19-cv-04790 784 Richard Dismuke 2:19-cv-04792 785 Larry Cole 2:19-cv-04798 786 Joel Chapa 2:19-cv-04810 787 Leif E. Anderson 2:19-cv-04821 788 Mary Eddy 2:19-cv-04825 789 Dora Chatman 2:19-cv-04826 790 Stephen Eaton 2:19-cv-04829 791 David A. Ealy 2:19-cv-04837 792 Jack Cunningham 2:19-cv-04844 793 Clara C. Dacko 2:19-cv-04848 794 Linda Duffy 2:19-cv-04862 795 Jean C. Darby 2:19-cv-04878 796 Tina Dasher 2:19-cv-04882 797 Mark A. Anderson 2:19-cv-04883 798 Arnada F. Davis 2:19-cv-04906 799 Jamie Davis 2:19-cv-04907 800 Augusta L. Colson 2:19-cv-04909 801 John Elliott 2:19-cv-04913 802 David Andrews 2:19-cv-04914 803 Deborah K. Elmer 2:19-cv-04918 804 Lori A. Enos 2:19-cv-04925 805 Adela Anguiano 2:19-cv-04927 806 Troy Ersch 2:19-cv-04932 807 Theresa Cooper 2:19-cv-04939 808 Doris Crutchfield 2:19-cv-04944 809 Kevin Carr 2:19-cv-04950 810 Letrell Cuff 2:19-cv-04951 811 Robbin Carridine 2:19-cv-04952 812 Catherine Carroll 2:19-cv-04960 813 Lula M. Day 2:19-cv-04961 816 John Fry 2:19-cv-04976 817 Angela Clinton 2:19-cv-04981 818 Pat J. Evans 2:19-cv-04986 819 Cynthia Bonacci 2:19-cv-04994 820 Robin Fizhugh 2:19-cv-05006 821 Joyce Carvalho 2:19-cv-05016 822 Calvin Carver 2:19-cv-05022 823 Sherley L. Booker 2:19-cv-05027 824 Lee Booth 2:19-cv-05052 825 Albert V. Borboa 2:19-cv-05053 826 Evelyn W. Frey 2:19-cv-05069 827 Mary Duncan 2:19-cv-05072 828 Mary Jane Franklin 2:19-cv-05073 829 Gerardo Gallaga 2:19-cv-05089 830 Libia Felix 2:19-cv-05094 831 Charlotte Edwards 2:19-cv-05097 832 Amber N. Felthauser 2:19-cv-05098 833 Dorthy Edwards 2:19-cv-05099 834 Jacqualine Ferera 2:19-cv-05102 835 Beverly Ficklin 2:19-cv-05111 836 Keith Franklin 2:19-cv-05112 837 Walter Gaddis 2:19-cv-05115 838 Matilda Gagliardi 2:19-cv-05119 839 Barbara S. Foutty 2:19-cv-05132 840 Debbie A. Garcia 2:19-cv-05135 841 Sue A. Fink 2:19-cv-05138 842 Susan K. Kellar 2:19-cv-05166 843 Robert L. Johnson, Jr. 2:19-cv-05168 844 Susan K. Kelley 2:19-cv-05174 845 Timothy Henry 2:19-cv-05177 846 Angela K. Henry 2:19-cv-05185 847 David M. Huddleston 2:19-cv-05186 848 Glenda Jackson 2:19-cv-05193 849 Bobby G Jones 2:19-cv-05196 850 Darlene Huettenberger 2:19-cv-05197 851 Gary D. Johnson 2:19-cv-05199 852 Vivian Knudsen 2:19-cv-05209 853 Annie M Jones 2:19-cv-05217 854 Gordon Hills 2:19-cv-05220 855 Barbara A. Jones 2:19-cv-05230 856 Vickie L. Jones 2:19-cv-05242 857 Ronnie W. Johnson 2:19-cv-05247 858 Vickie Kemp 2:19-cv-05249 859 Kathleen F. Kimble 2:19-cv-05263 860 Michael Hurley 2:19-cv-05267 863 Donna Hines 2:19-cv-05275 864 Virginia Johnson Gruver 2:19-cv-05281 865 Margaret Jordan 2:19-cv-05295 866 Williard I. Justice 2:19-cv-05304 867 Jane Krause 2:19-cv-05312 868 Carol M. Kristian 2:19-cv-05315 869 Tammy Jobe 2:19-cv-05319 870 Connie Ivory 2:19-cv-05324 871 Karen C. King 2:19-cv-05327 872 Jerry R. Kingery 2:19-cv-05328 873 Constance Gary 2:19-cv-05335 874 Henry H. Hessen 2:19-cv-05341 875 Patrick W. Lacke 2:19-cv-05349 876 Barton S. Hickey 2:19-cv-05353 877 Cinda Geerlings 2:19-cv-05359 878 Pamela Kazak 2:19-cv-05369 879 David Gilbert 2:19-cv-05370 880 Romona Kea 2:19-cv-05375 881 Phyllis j. Kinsey 2:19-cv-05376 882 Edward W. Gildner 2:19-cv-05379 883 Lisa Keith 2:19-cv-05385 884 Deborah Gilstrap 2:19-cv-05387 885 Marion Francis Keith 2:19-cv-05391 886 Sue Langham 2:19-cv-05401 887 William D. Hinshaw 2:19-cv-05415 888 Mark D. Hochul 2:19-cv-05428 889 Kathleen Lalor 2:19-cv-05507 890 Nancy K. Garza 2:19-cv-05528 891 Richard Graham 2:19-cv-05544 892 Louise Jones 2:19-cv-05548 893 June S. Grumbein 2:19-cv-05558 894 Sarah Holland 2:19-cv-05563 895 Ronald W. Grissom 2:19-cv-05600 896 Darren Gines 2:19-cv-05608 897 Milton E. Hansen, Jr. 2:19-cv-05610 898 Loyce A. Hampson 2:19-cv-05623 899 Teresa Haney 2:19-cv-05636 Linda Guzman, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Barbara 900 2:19-cv-05649 Guzman, Deceased 901 Connie Gamez 2:19-cv-05652 902 Jesse Hales 2:19-cv-05697 903 Paul Glasper 2:19-cv-05699 904 Shelley M. Harder 2:19-cv-05703 905 Anne A. Headrick 2:19-cv-05728 906 Sandra S. Hart 2:19-cv-05731 909 Verna Heideman 2:19-cv-05750 910 Derric R. Henderson 2:19-cv-05773 911 Jason A. Head 2:19-cv-05847 912 Vanessa Harper 2:19-cv-05850 913 Jeffrey A Heaps 2:19-cv-05853 914 Barbara A. Harper 2:19-cv-05864 915 Rhonda Leopold 2:19-cv-06011 916 Carol A. Lentz 2:19-cv-06012 917 Terica Lemon 2:19-cv-06014 918 Alberta Lee 2:19-cv-06017 919 Jerry Lawley, Jr. 2:19-cv-06026 920 Delois Miller 2:19-cv-06069 921 Gail H. Mills 2:19-cv-06072 922 Joseph Mirabile 2:19-cv-06078 923 Barbara Mire 2:19-cv-06079 924 Berchia M. Mitchell 2:19-cv-06106 925 Jason R. Mitchell 2:19-cv-06110 926 Alice Moore 2:19-cv-06123 927 Linda L. Hopkins 2:19-cv-06152 928 Kimberly A. Horn 2:19-cv-06160 929 Veronica C. Williams 2:19-cv-06193 Zane Libert, as the Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Julianna Libert, 930 2:19-cv-06198 deceased 931 Jerry Winthrop 2:19-cv-06213 932 Joe N. Little 2:19-cv-06225 933 Betty J. Withrow 2:19-cv-06226 934 Teena Williams 2:19-cv-06236 935 Kevin Wilson 2:19-cv-06305 936 Desiree Lovins 2:19-cv-06323 937 Robert R. Houser 2:19-cv-06349 938 Judith Lambert 2:19-cv-06352 939 Anthony Lanas 2:19-cv-06354 940 Juliana Wimberly 2:19-cv-06370 941 Betty Lowther 2:19-cv-06374 942 Joseph W. Lucas 2:19-cv-06376 943 Candace M. Malin 2:19-cv-06392 944 Helen M. Martinez 2:19-cv-06426 945 Raul Martinez 2:19-cv-06429 946 Rebecca Meader 2:19-cv-06437 947 Shekina D. Mason 2:19-cv-06439 948 Jacobus Mekes 2:19-cv-06443 Sharon W. Mellott, as the Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Jerry 949 2:19-cv-06445 W. Mellott, deceased 950 Deborah Mercer 2:19-cv-06452 951 Kym Matthews 2:19-cv-06455 954 Jessie M. Merriweather 2:19-cv-06460 955 Oliver T. Mihm 2:19-cv-06482 956 Henry G. Miles 2:19-cv-06486 957 Lora Wilson 2:19-cv-06490 958 Alexander J. Mayfield 2:19-cv-06491 959 Teresa Mayo 2:19-cv-06495 960 Arlene Miller 2:19-cv-06496 961 Thelma McClellen 2:19-cv-06520 962 Brenda McConnachie 2:19-cv-06522 963 Dee A. Mankins 2:19-cv-06533 964 Iris L. Manning 2:19-cv-06534 965 Grachell L. Manuel 2:19-cv-06537 966 Janet S. Markello 2:19-cv-06540 967 Douglas Worden 2:19-cv-06542 968 Joann C. Worden 2:19-cv-06550 969 Marilyn Young 2:19-cv-06599 970 Missouri McCann 2:19-cv-06614 971 Hollis Q. Moore 2:19-cv-06637 972 Antonio Morales 2:19-cv-06641 973 Anna M. Morales 2:19-cv-06642 974 August Morella 2:19-cv-06644 975 Jessie Noiel 2:19-cv-06649 976 Jeffrey A. Oakley 2:19-cv-06656 977 Norma J. Ochoa 2:19-cv-06657 978 Marilyn D. Ojeda 2:19-cv-06660 979 Mindy Oosting 2:19-cv-06673 980 William H. Morgan 2:19-cv-06677 981 Marilyn A. Palma 2:19-cv-06690 982 Darrell M. Papaleo 2:19-cv-06693 983 Betty A. Parks 2:19-cv-06696 984 Kay Parks 2:19-cv-06697 985 Maria D. Parovel 2:19-cv-06699 986 Deborah L Patterson 2:19-cv-06706 987 Lisa York-Williams 2:19-cv-06712 988 Shirley Murray 2:19-cv-06713 989 Sandy Myers 2:19-cv-06721 990 Renato Natal 2:19-cv-06730 991 Andrenette Marshall 2:19-cv-06748 992 Daniel Peters 2:19-cv-06823 993 David Peterson, Sr. 2:19-cv-06827 994 Leonard Nesbitt 2:19-cv-06828 995 Cherri D. Young 2:19-cv-06837 Rachel Martinez, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Richard 996 2:19-cv-06845 Martinez, Deceased 997 Annette K. Morris 2:19-cv-06862 1000 John Nicastro 2:19-cv-06889 1001 Eddie Nicholson 2:19-cv-06897 1002 Joyce Niemi 2:19-cv-06899 1003 Luis Nieves 2:19-cv-06900 1004 Barbara Noble 2:19-cv-06911 1005 Norma Wright 2:19-cv-06918 1006 Norman Reynolds 2:19-cv-06938 1007 Luis Rodriguez-Charriez 2:19-cv-06947 1008 Walter R. Roger 2:19-cv-06950 1009 James Potter 2:19-cv-06962 1010 Misty C. Powell 2:19-cv-06966 1011 Leon Rhodes and Veronica Rhodes 2:19-cv-06967 1012 Carolyn Powers 2:19-cv-06974 1013 Francis Presto 2:19-cv-06981 1014 Deborah A. Richard 2:19-cv-06989 1015 Daniel Paul 2:19-cv-07003 1016 Louise C. Peaco 2:19-cv-07010 1017 Pamela M. Pruitt 2:19-cv-07022 1018 Kathy Ridgeway 2:19-cv-07034 1019 Esteban Rojo 2:19-cv-07039 1020 Anthony Riley 2:19-cv-07045 1021 Ricky L. Wilson 2:19-cv-07047 1022 Annette H. Ringley 2:19-cv-07049 1023 Linda Roach 2:19-cv-07057 1024 Leona Quinn 2:19-cv-07059 1025 Frank Quinones 2:19-cv-07065 1026 Sharon Raabe 2:19-cv-07069 1027 Judith Robertson 2:19-cv-07082 1028 Martina Ramirez 2:19-cv-07083 1029 James Randolph 2:19-cv-07104 1030 Debbie M. Rankin 2:19-cv-07111 1031 April Rondeau 2:19-cv-07119 1032 Ruth Roozing-Grimsrud 2:19-cv-07126 1033 Manuel G. Rodriguez 2:19-cv-07137 1034 David B. Zarosky 2:19-cv-07139 1035 Brandi Peebles 2:19-cv-07166 David Pennypacker, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Cynthia 1036 2:19-cv-07175 Pennypacker, Deceased 1037 Eric D. Perkins 2:19-cv-07188 1038 Michael Scadden 2:19-CV-07191 Claudia Ortega, as the Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Josefina 1039 2:19-cv-07201 Silva, deceased 1040 William Schiffert 2:19-cv-07203 1041 Sydney B. Silver 2:19-cv-07206 1042 Darlet A. Simile 2:19-cv-07208 1045 Ronald A. Simmons 2:19-cv-07216 1046 Sheryl D. Simpson 2:19-cv-07218 1047 Theresa Sipler 2:19-cv-07222 1048 Ben Schwartz 2:19-cv-07238 1049 Robert Smith 2:19-cv-07247 Rita Scott, As Proposed Representative of the Estate of Melvern Scott, 1050 2:19-cv-07250 deceased 1051 Nancy Rouseau 2:19-cv-07267 1052 Lisa C. Rowlette 2:19-cv-07272 1053 Amanda Scrimpsher 2:19-cv-07300 1054 Roger Zickefoose 2:19-cv-07306 1055 Scott E. Shaner 2:19-cv-07348 1056 Raymond L. Shaner 2:19-cv-07349 1057 Anita L. Shank 2:19-cv-07352 1058 Carla A. Smith 2:19-cv-07358 1059 Debra Sheffey 2:19-cv-07372 1060 Gloria Sheppard 2:19-cv-07382 1061 Patricia A. Smith 2:19-cv-07383 1062 Andrew Sherrod 2:19-cv-07388 1063 Sharon Smith 2:19-cv-07389 1064 Valorie Sherrod 2:19-cv-07390 1065 Annette H. Shook 2:19-cv-07400 1066 Ysleta Smith 2:19-cv-07403 1067 Arlene Sidenstick 2:19-cv-07425 1068 David A. Soliz 2:19-cv-07493 1069 Gilbert J. Sosa 2:19-cv-07500 1070 Christina Spaulding 2:19-cv-07509 1071 Heidi McGee 2:19-cv-07516 1072 Troy McKelvy 2:19-cv-07521 1073 Shanda M. Meacacke 2:19-cv-07543 1074 Alan R. Sussman 2:19-cv-07552 1075 Wendy Swartz 2:19-cv-07555 1076 Brenda Swift 2:19-cv-07558 1077 Dawn Takacs 2:19-cv-07560 1078 Kermit E. Tate 2:19-cv-07563 1079 Tony E. Taylor 2:19-cv-07569 1080 Ronald Perrin 2:19-cv-07572 1081 Barbara A. Rauenzahn 2:19-cv-07574 1082 Janet Reardon 2:19-cv-07580 1083 Elspeth A. Teed 2:19-cv-07584 1084 Michael B. Tenore 2:19-cv-07587 1085 Ruby M. Terrasas 2:19-cv-07589 1086 Pamela D. Terry 2:19-cv-07590 1087 Miriam Thomas 2:19-cv-07597 1088 Willie Thomas 2:19-cv-07600 1091 Dean St. John 2:19-cv-07624 Diane Robinson, As Proposed Representative of the Estate of James 1092 2:19-cv-07627 Stacker, Deceased 1093 Daniel M. Russell 2:19-cv-07633 1094 Carrie L. Stark 2:19-cv-07634 1095 Courtney Stark 2:19-cv-07636 1096 Rose Starr 2:19-cv-07639 1097 Sally D. Reed 2:19-cv-07642 1098 Gail E. Sachs 2:19-cv-07653 1099 Sandra Steen 2:19-cv-07658 1100 Sheila K. Sain 2:19-cv-07661 1101 Yvette Sanders 2:19-cv-07673 1102 Vashon Stephens 2:19-cv-07676 1103 Sonja F. Anthony 2:19-cv-07681 1104 Madge E. Reed 2:19-cv-07701 1105 Dea Reed 2:19-cv-07707 1106 Linda K. Reed 2:19-cv-07717 1107 Shasta Cook 2:19-cv-07725 1108 Norma Fuentes 2:19-cv-07739 1109 Donna J. Renard 2:19-cv-07763 1110 Mark E. Lynch 2:19-cv-07771 1111 Tammy Sateriale 2:19-cv-07793 1112 Arnoldo Sauceda 2:19-cv-07799 1113 Rodney Stewart 2:19-cv-07800 1114 Ricky Stewart 2:19-cv-07804 1115 Nicholas Savini 2:19-cv-07825 1116 Lennie Stowes 2:19-cv-07851 1117 Joan V. Streek 2:19-cv-07857 Fred Stuhlemmer, As Proposed Representative of the Estate of Leah 1118 2:19-cv-07864 Stuhlemmer, Deceased 1119 Eric T. Whitfield 2:19-cv-07871 1120 Susan Reitz 2:19-cv-07879 1121 Nowell E. Renth 2:19-cv-07884 1122 Silvia Retana 2:19-cv-07886 1123 Kevin Wiggs 2:19-cv-07893 1124 Sylvia Thrower 2:19-cv-07898 1125 Mona L. Timms 2:19-cv-07901 1126 Robert W. Tonini 2:19-cv-07908 1127 Jeffrey L. Montgomery 2:19-cv-07929 1128 Linda Palafox 2:19-cv-07955 1129 Mary N. Vieyra 2:19-cv-07990 1130 Mary Vincent 2:19-cv-08003 1131 Geraldine Virges 2:19-cv-08004 1132 Carmen Vitello 2:19-cv-08007 1133 Lois Torres 2:19-cv-08013 1136 Michael Waddy 2:19-cv-08035 1137 Kimberly A. Willhite 2:19-cv-08043 1138 Jeanette R. Wadholm-Williams 2:19-cv-08045 1139 Brycelynn Wakkukait 2:19-cv-08095 1140 Bonnie S. Walburn 2:19-cv-08097 1141 Dee N. Trejo 2:19-cv-08141 1142 Donna M. Tritto 2:19-cv-08150 1143 Arthur L. Waller 2:19-cv-08151 1144 Joseph Walsh 2:19-cv-08155 1145 Wanda J. Turnage 2:19-cv-08200 1146 Donald Turnbow 2:19-cv-08202 1147 Donald W. Vanadore Jr. 2:19-cv-08253 1148 Roberta L. Vankuren 2:19-cv-08259 1149 Linda I. Ruffin 2:19-cv-08279 1150 Jerome G. Washington 2:19-cv-08291 Cherry Watson as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Gary E. 1151 2:19-cv-08323 Watson, Deceased 1152 Betty Webb 2:19-cv-08430 1153 Peggy Wehr 2:19-cv-08436 1154 Daniel E. Varner 2:19-cv-08449 1155 Maria Welch 2:19-cv-08503 1156 Jimmy Welch 2:19-cv-08505 1157 Cody Weldon 2:19-cv-08506 1158 Cornelius Westbrook 2:19-cv-08509 1159 Audrey M. Werner 2:19-cv-08547 1160 Kathleen West 2:19-cv-08562 1161 Joseph White Sr. 2:19-cv-08573 1162 Sandra E. White 2:19-cv-08601 1163 Robert Acosta 2:19-cv-08709 1164 Eugene Fisher 2:19-cv-08838 Mary Bellmore, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of 1165 2:19-cv-10047 Donn Bellmore, Deceased 1166 Katie Ware 2:19-cv-10141 1167 Michael Davis 2:19-cv-11777 1168 Dennis Thompson 2:19-cv-12040 1169 Janet Burau 2:19-cv-12611 1170 Rose Campbell 2:19-cv-12613 1171 Betty Jessie 2:19-cv-12618 1172 William Sayles 2:19-cv-12628 1173 Robert Brantley 2:19-cv-20086 1174 Brenda Kellam 2:20-cv-07294 1175 Kathleen Anderson 2:20-cv-07343 1176 Sandra Loesche 2:20-cv-07344 1177 Alex Montiel 2:20-cv-07345 1178 Dolores Payne 2:20-cv-07348 1181 Linda K Shierling 2:20-cv-20743