Breuninger v. T. Edward Williams
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee KX RICHARD BREUNINGER er al., : Plaintiffs, : : 20 Civ. 7033 (JPC) (RWL) -v- : : ORDER T. EDWARD WILLIAMS e¢ al., : Defendants. : wee KX JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge: By June 17, 2024 at 5:00 p.m., Counter-Claimants and Counterclaim Defendants may file letters of no longer than three pages advising the Court as to whether Counter-Claimants’ second counterclaim for abuse of process should be dismissed for failure to allege that Counterclaim Defendants “employ[ed] regularly issued legal process to compel performance or forbearance of some act.” Manhattan Enter. Grp. LLC v. Higgins, 816 F. App’x 512, 514 (2d Cir. 2020) (quoting Savino v. City of New York, 331 F.3d 63, 76 (2d Cir. 2003)). See Dkt. 262 (Supplemental Counterclaims) | 330-334. SO ORDERED. Was Dated: June 12, 2024 aofB New York, New York JOHN P. CRONAN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Breuninger v. T. Edward Williams (Breuninger v. T. Edward Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.