Brett v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.

668 So. 2d 664, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1556, 1996 WL 72194
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 1996·No. No. 94-4071·Published

Opinion

ALLEN, Judge.

In this workers’ compensation case the judge applied section 440.15(3)(b)4.d(II), Florida Statutes (1991), as limiting the claimant’s wage loss eligibility to a consecutive period of 52 weeks commencing upon the attainment of maximum medical improvement. Winn Dixie v. Resnikoff, 659 So.2d 1297 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), establishes that section 440.15(3)(b)4.d does not create an uninterrupted period of eligibility commencing immediately upon the attainment of maximum medical improvement, but rather is merely a cumulative limitation on the total number of weeks for which a claimant may be entitled to wage loss benefits. We therefore reverse the appealed order as to the denial of wage loss benefits beyond the expiration of 52 calendar weeks after maximum medical improvement. The order is otherwise affirmed, and the ease is remanded.

DAVIS, J., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brett v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc., 668 So. 2d 664, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1556, 1996 WL 72194 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

668 So. 2d 664 (Brett v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winn Dixie v. Resnikoff
659 So. 2d 1297 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)