Brett Kandell v. Dror Niv

Court of Chancery of Delaware·Decided October 14, 2016·No. CA 11812-VCG·Published

Opinion

COURT OF CHANCERY

OF THE

STATE OF DELAWARE

Sam Glasscock III CHANCERY COURTHOUSE VICE CHANCELLOR 34 The Circle GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 AND

NEW CASTLE COUNTY COURTHOUSE 500 NORTH KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19980-3734

October 14, 2016

Peter B. Andrews, Esquire Kenneth J. Nachbar, Esquire Craig J. Springer, Esquire Thomas P. Will, Esquire David M. Sborz, Esquire Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell Andrews & Springer, LLC 1201 N. Market Street 3801 Kennett Pike Wilmington, DE 19801 Building C, Suite 305 Wilmington, DE 19807

RE: Brett Kandell, et al. v. Dror Niv, et al.

C.A. No. 11812-VCG

Dear Counsel:

It was brought to my attention today that the parties have filed a Stipulation Extending the Word Limit and a request for an Order extending the word limit to 16,000 words per brief. I also note that the Opening Brief is due on Monday, October 17. Rather than throw the briefing schedule into turmoil, I have granted the Order to extend the word limit. Please be aware, however, that a motion to extend the word limit should be brought to the presiding judge’s attention in sufficient time for him to consider the request, accompanied by a statement of good cause. Presenting the Court with a Morton’s Fork—blow up the briefing schedule or accede to the request—should, in the future, be avoided.

To the extent that the foregoing requires an Order to take effect, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sincerely,

/s/ Sam Glasscock III

Vice Chancellor

cc: Register in Chancery

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brett Kandell v. Dror Niv, (Del. Ct. App. 2016).

Brett Kandell v. Dror Niv (Brett Kandell v. Dror Niv) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.