Brett Kandell v. Dror Niv

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Brett Kandell v. Dror Niv

DecidedOctober 14, 2016

DocketCA 11812-VCG

StatusPublished

This text of Brett Kandell v. Dror Niv (Brett Kandell v. Dror Niv) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brett Kandell v. Dror Niv, (Del. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE Sam Glasscock III CHANCERY COURTHOUSE VICE CHANCELLOR 34 The Circle GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 AND NEW CASTLE COUNTY COURTHOUSE 500 NORTH KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19980-3734

October 14, 2016

Peter B. Andrews, Esquire Kenneth J. Nachbar, Esquire Craig J. Springer, Esquire Thomas P. Will, Esquire David M. Sborz, Esquire Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell Andrews & Springer, LLC 1201 N. Market Street 3801 Kennett Pike Wilmington, DE 19801 Building C, Suite 305 Wilmington, DE 19807

RE: Brett Kandell, et al. v. Dror Niv, et al. C.A. No. 11812-VCG

Dear Counsel:

It was brought to my attention today that the parties have filed a Stipulation Extending the Word Limit and a request for an Order extending the word limit to 16,000 words per brief. I also note that the Opening Brief is due on Monday, October 17. Rather than throw the briefing schedule into turmoil, I have granted the Order to extend the word limit. Please be aware, however, that a motion to extend the word limit should be brought to the presiding judge’s attention in sufficient time for him to consider the request, accompanied by a statement of good cause. Presenting the Court with a Morton’s Fork—blow up the briefing schedule or accede to the request—should, in the future, be avoided.

To the extent that the foregoing requires an Order to take effect, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sincerely,

/s/ Sam Glasscock III

Vice Chancellor

cc: Register in Chancery

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE Sam Glasscock III CHANCERY COURTHOUSE VICE CHANCELLOR 34 The Circle GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 AND NEW CASTLE COUNTY COURTHOUSE 500 NORTH KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19980-3734

October 14, 2016

Peter B. Andrews, Esquire Kenneth J. Nachbar, Esquire Craig J. Springer, Esquire Thomas P. Will, Esquire David M. Sborz, Esquire Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell Andrews & Springer, LLC 1201 N. Market Street 3801 Kennett Pike Wilmington, DE 19801 Building C, Suite 305 Wilmington, DE 19807

RE: Brett Kandell, et al. v. Dror Niv, et al. C.A. No. 11812-VCG

Dear Counsel:

It was brought to my attention today that the parties have filed a Stipulation Extending the Word Limit and a request for an Order extending the word limit to 16,000 words per brief. I also note that the Opening Brief is due on Monday, October 17. Rather than throw the briefing schedule into turmoil, I have granted the Order to extend the word limit. Please be aware, however, that a motion to extend the word limit should be brought to the presiding judge’s attention in sufficient time for him to consider the request, accompanied by a statement of good cause. Presenting the Court with a Morton’s Fork—blow up the briefing schedule or accede to the request—should, in the future, be avoided.

To the extent that the foregoing requires an Order to take effect, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sincerely,

/s/ Sam Glasscock III

Vice Chancellor

cc: Register in Chancery

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Brett Kandell v. Dror Niv, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brett-kandell-v-dror-niv-delch-2016.