Brett Bray, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation And Gulf States Toyota, Inc.// Tejas Toyota, Inc. v. Tejas Toyota, Inc.// Cross- Brett Bray, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation And Gulf States Toyota, Inc.
This text of Brett Bray, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation And Gulf States Toyota, Inc.// Tejas Toyota, Inc. v. Tejas Toyota, Inc.// Cross- Brett Bray, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation And Gulf States Toyota, Inc. (Brett Bray, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation And Gulf States Toyota, Inc.// Tejas Toyota, Inc. v. Tejas Toyota, Inc.// Cross- Brett Bray, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation And Gulf States Toyota, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-11-00223-CV
Appellants, Brett Bray, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation; and Gulf States Toyota, Inc.// Cross-Appellant, Tejas Toyota, Inc.
v.
Appellee, Tejas Toyota, Inc.//Cross-Appellees, Brett Bray, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation; and Gulf States Toyota, Inc.
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-09-002086, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA-DOYAL, JUDGE PRESIDING
CONCURRING OPINION
I concur in the judgment and reasoning of the majority opinion, with the exception of
the discussion of the statutory duty of good faith and fair dealing found in footnote eleven. Because we
need not address the applicability of the statutory duty of good faith and fair dealing to dispose of the
appeal, I decline to join footnote eleven of the majority opinion. See Tex. R. App. P. 47. 1 (courts of
appeals must hand down written opinion that is brief as practicable but that addresses every issue raised
and necessary to final disposition of appeal).
__________________________________________
Diane M. Henson, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Henson
Filed: February 2, 2012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brett Bray, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation And Gulf States Toyota, Inc.// Tejas Toyota, Inc. v. Tejas Toyota, Inc.// Cross- Brett Bray, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation And Gulf States Toyota, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brett-bray-in-his-official-capacity-as-director-of-the-motor-vehicle-texapp-2012.