Brett Arnold and Patricia A. Rudder v. B.R. Israel

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 30, 2010·No. 02-10-00164-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00164-CV

BRETT ARNOLD AND PATRICIA A. APPELLANTS RUDDER

V.

B.R. ISRAEL APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On December 1, 2010, we notified appellants that their brief had not been

filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R.

App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. within ten days a response reasonably explaining the failure to timely file a brief.

See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any response.

Because appellants' brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: December 30, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brett Arnold and Patricia A. Rudder v. B.R. Israel, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Brett Arnold and Patricia A. Rudder v. B.R. Israel (Brett Arnold and Patricia A. Rudder v. B.R. Israel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.