Brethrick v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Brethrick v. State

182 So. 923, 28 Ala. App. 603

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 21, 1938

Docket8 Div. 591.

StatusPublished

This text of 182 So. 923 (Brethrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brethrick v. State, 182 So. 923, 28 Ala. App. 603 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The indictment was not subject to any of the grounds of demurrer interposed.

This is just another plain case of a flagrant violation of the prohibition law.

We have considered all the questions appearing on the record or reserved by bill of exceptions as required by Section 3258 of the Code of 1923. The court is satisfied that no error of a prejudicial nature has been committed, and as is required by the above named Section of the Code, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, Judge.

The indictment was not subject to any of the grounds of demurrer interposed.

This is just another plain case of a flagrant violation of the prohibition law.

We have considered all the questions appearing on the record or reserved by bill of exceptions as required by Section 3258 of the Code of 1923. The court is satisfied that no error of a prejudicial nature has been committed, and as is required by the above named Section of the Code, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 So. 923, 28 Ala. App. 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brethrick-v-state-alactapp-1938.