Brethrick v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Brethrick v. State

182 So. 923, 28 Ala. App. 603

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 1938·No. 8 Div. 591.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The indictment was not subject to any of the grounds of demurrer interposed.

This is just another plain case of a flagrant violation of the prohibition law.

We have considered all the questions appearing on the record or reserved by bill of exceptions as required by Section 3258 of the Code of 1923. The court is satisfied that no error of a prejudicial nature has been committed, and as is required by the above named Section of the Code, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, Judge.

The indictment was not subject to any of the grounds of demurrer interposed.

This is just another plain case of a flagrant violation of the prohibition law.

We have considered all the questions appearing on the record or reserved by bill of exceptions as required by Section 3258 of the Code of 1923. The court is satisfied that no error of a prejudicial nature has been committed, and as is required by the above named Section of the Code, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Brethrick v. State, 182 So. 923, 28 Ala. App. 603 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

182 So. 923 (Brethrick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.