Bret Radcliffe, Robert Radcliffe, and Mamba Minerals, LLC v. Tidal Petroleum, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bret Radcliffe, Robert Radcliffe, and Mamba Minerals, LLC v. Tidal Petroleum, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 1049
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 18, 2016·No. 04-15-00644-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 18, 2016

No. 04-15-00644-CV

Bret RADCLIFFE, Robert Radcliffe, and Mamba Minerals, LLC, Appellants

v.

TIDAL PETROLEUM, INC., Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas Trial Court No. 13-07-00176-CVL Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellants’ reply brief was filed on March 23, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.3. On April 15, 2016, appellee Tidal Petroleum, Inc. filed a response to Appellant’s reply brief and a motion for extension of time to file the response. Appellee’s motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s response to Appellants’ reply brief is deemed timely filed.

It is so ORDERED on April 18, 2016.

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bret Radcliffe, Robert Radcliffe, and Mamba Minerals, LLC v. Tidal Petroleum, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Bret Radcliffe, Robert Radcliffe, and Mamba Minerals, LLC v. Tidal Petroleum, Inc. (Bret Radcliffe, Robert Radcliffe, and Mamba Minerals, LLC v. Tidal Petroleum, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.