Breswick & Co. v. Doeskin Products, Inc.

283 A.D. 1036, 131 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6206

This text of 283 A.D. 1036 (Breswick & Co. v. Doeskin Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Breswick & Co. v. Doeskin Products, Inc., 283 A.D. 1036, 131 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed and the cross motion of appellants to dismiss the proceeding pursuant to section 1293 of the Civil Practice Act denied, with leave to the appellants to answer within ten days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry thereof. The court at Special Term granted the requested relief without passing upon appellants’ cross motion. We conclude that such cross motion should have been denied, but it was unwarranted to grant the inspection and examination without giving appellants an opportunity to answer the petition (Matter of Brentmore Estates V. Hotel Barbizon, 263 App. Div. 389). Settle order on notice. Present —- Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Bastow and Botein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brentmore Estates, Inc. v. Hotel Barbizon, Inc.
263 A.D. 389 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 A.D. 1036, 131 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breswick-co-v-doeskin-products-inc-nyappdiv-1954.