Brest v. KLEIDMAN
790 N.E.2d 265, 99 N.Y.2d 642, 760 N.Y.S.2d 92, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 385
This text of 790 N.E.2d 265 (Brest v. KLEIDMAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brest v. KLEIDMAN, 790 N.E.2d 265, 99 N.Y.2d 642, 760 N.Y.S.2d 92, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 385 (N.Y. 2003).
Opinion
Motion and cross motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion by Jeremy Brest for the imposition of sanctions denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
790 N.E.2d 265, 99 N.Y.2d 642, 760 N.Y.S.2d 92, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brest-v-kleidman-ny-2003.