Brest v. Broslan Jewelry Co.
274 A.D. 880, 83 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3847
Opinion
It was error to direct a nonsuit upon the ground that the evidence established that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. (See Hente v. Shercoop Corp., 289 N. Y. 140; Heimer v. Stento, 270 App. Div. 665; Richards v. Rohert Corp., 271 App. Div. 924, affd. 297 N. Y. 605; Barnett v. 41-43 East 28th St. Corp., 271 App. Div. 749.) Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brest v. Broslan Jewelry Co., 274 A.D. 880, 83 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).
274 A.D. 880 (Brest v. Broslan Jewelry Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richards v. Lawrence Robert Corporation
75 N.E.2d 623 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)
Hente v. Shercoop Corporation
44 N.E.2d 402 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)
Heimer v. Stento
270 A.D. 665 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)