Bressler v. Stanek

74 N.W. 1118, 10 S.D. 625, 1898 S.D. LEXIS 51
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedApril 5, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 N.W. 1118 (Bressler v. Stanek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bressler v. Stanek, 74 N.W. 1118, 10 S.D. 625, 1898 S.D. LEXIS 51 (S.D. 1898).

Opinion

Fuller, J.

By this action, which was tried to the court without a jury, a dispute between neighbors as to the location of a quarter-section corner was judicially determined in favor of defendant; and plaintiff, on appeal, contends, in effect, that the evidence is insufficient to justify the conclusion reached, and presents for our examination an abstract containing only such portions of the material evidence as best serve his purpose ■ — necessitating a laborious perusal of respondent’s amended abstract for the purpose of ascertaining the full import of the testimony essential to a proper determination of that question, which is in fact the only point properly before us. As the evidence, under any view of the case, is amply sufficient, it would be a useless expenditure of time and space to collect from these abstracts the voluminous testimony of the witnesses, for the purpose of an orderly presentment of the same in this opinion. From a careful examination of the record, we are convinced that no ground for a reversal exists, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Discipline of Mines
2000 SD 89 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 N.W. 1118, 10 S.D. 625, 1898 S.D. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bressler-v-stanek-sd-1898.