Bressler v. Kalow

13 A.D.3d 70, 785 N.Y.S.2d 328, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14718

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.), entered on or about June 15, 2004, which denied defendants’ motion to strike plaintiffs jury demand, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs claims are primarily legal in nature, affording him the opportunity for full relief by means of a monetary award under the facts as alleged (see Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft v Spinale, 177 AD2d 315 [1991]). Since plaintiff pursued an accounting merely to determine the amount of such damages, the initial joinder of prayers for legal and equitable relief did not constitute a waiver of the right to a jury trial in the first instance (Lex Tenants Corp. v Gramercy N. Assoc., 284 AD2d 278 [2001]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Lerner, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bressler v. Kalow, 13 A.D.3d 70, 785 N.Y.S.2d 328, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

13 A.D.3d 70 (Bressler v. Kalow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft v. Spinale
177 A.D.2d 315 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Lex Tenants Corp. v. Gramercy North Associates
284 A.D.2d 278 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)