Bressingham v. City of New York
This text of 286 A.D. 811 (Bressingham v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Concur — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse insofar as the judgment dismisses the third-party complaint of the appellant Marosy Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc., against the third-party defendant Naclerio Contracting Co., Inc. Judgment over should be awarded appellant Marosy against Naclerio on the ground that the evidence discloses that the negligence of the latter was the primary cause of the accident, and the negligence of Marosy was secondary and passive.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 A.D. 811, 143 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bressingham-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1955.