Bresnick v. Saypol

270 A.D. 837, 61 N.Y.S.2d 376, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4204
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 22, 1946·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In the absence of an answer showing bad faith of petitioner, it was error to decide this application in favor of the respondents. In the circumstances here the respondents should be afforded a further opportunity of answering the petition. The application for the order should be determined after the issues thus raised are disposed of. Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified accordingly, with costs to appellant and with leave to respondents to answer within ten days after service of the order to be entered herein, on [838] payment of said costs. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Peek, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bresnick v. Saypol, 270 A.D. 837, 61 N.Y.S.2d 376, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4204 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

270 A.D. 837 (Bresnick v. Saypol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gottdenker v. Philadelphia & Reading Corp.
31 A.D.2d 152 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
In re Friedman
271 A.D.2d 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)