Bresnick v. A. Meyers & Sons Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bresnick v. A. Meyers & Sons Corp.

283 A.D. 1013, 131 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6129

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 1013 (Bresnick v. A. Meyers & Sons Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bresnick v. A. Meyers & Sons Corp., 283 A.D. 1013, 131 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Because of our decision in Matter of Bresniclc v. Forman Skirt Co. (ante, p. 1013), decided herewith, we are reluctantly compelled to reverse the order appealed from. Undoubtedly, Special Term properly felt compelled to follow the order in the companion appeal, which we have decided improperly included a provision that petitioner “ shall not institute proceedings to increase respondents’ rents within one year from November 7, 1952 ”. Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the cross motions of the respondents to dismiss the petition denied. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Bastow and Botein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Because of our decision in Matter of Bresniclc v. Forman Skirt Co. (ante, p. 1013), decided herewith, we are reluctantly compelled to reverse the order appealed from. Undoubtedly, Special Term properly felt compelled to follow the order in the companion appeal, which we have decided improperly included a provision that petitioner “ shall not institute proceedings to increase respondents’ rents within one year from November 7, 1952 ”. Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the cross motions of the respondents to dismiss the petition denied. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Bastow and Botein, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 1013, 131 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bresnick-v-a-meyers-sons-corp-nyappdiv-1954.