Breslin v. State
456 So. 2d 1201, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1913, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14788
Opinions
We find no error in the adjudication of criminal contempt entered against a criminal defense lawyer as a result of grossly improper remarks made and repeated during a trial despite specific warnings to the contrary given by the trial judge to the attorney both in a previous proceeding and in the instant one. Ward v. State, 354 So.2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Kleinfeld v. State, 270 So.2d 22 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972), cert. denied, 275 So.2d 251 (Fla.1973); cf. Carroll v. State, 327 So.2d 881 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Breslin v. State, 456 So. 2d 1201, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1913, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14788 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
456 So. 2d 1201 (Breslin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Krueger v. State
351 So. 2d 47 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Ward v. State
354 So. 2d 438 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Fisher v. State
248 So. 2d 479 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Kleinfeld v. State
270 So. 2d 22 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Thomson v. State
398 So. 2d 514 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Clein v. State
52 So. 2d 117 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1950)
Carroll v. State
327 So. 2d 881 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Litus v. McGregor
381 So. 2d 757 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Ex Parte John D. Crews
173 So. 275 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)