Breslin v. State
This text of 456 So. 2d 1201 (Breslin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We find no error in the adjudication of criminal contempt entered against a criminal defense lawyer as a result of grossly improper remarks made and repeated during a trial despite specific warnings to the contrary given by the trial judge to the attorney both in a previous proceeding and in the instant one. Ward v. State, 354 So.2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Kleinfeld v. State, 270 So.2d 22 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972), cert. denied, 275 So.2d 251 (Fla.1973); cf. Carroll v. State, 327 So.2d 881 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
456 So. 2d 1201, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1913, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breslin-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.