Brentwood Village Corp. v. Unger

D.C. Circuit

Brentwood Village Corp. v. Unger

187 F.2d 214, 88 U.S. App. D.C. 151, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2233

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJanuary 18, 1951

Docket10644_1

StatusPublished

This text of 187 F.2d 214 (Brentwood Village Corp. v. Unger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brentwood Village Corp. v. Unger, 187 F.2d 214, 88 U.S. App. D.C. 151, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2233 (D.C. Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellees, a married couple, were tenants of appellant. They sued for damages for alleged injuries and loss of services caused by the wife’s falling upon a walk alleged to have been maintained by appellant in an icy and dangerous condition. The jury awarded $2500 to the wife and $500 to the husband.

Appellant raises several questions. They involve sufficiency of evidence as to negligence, injuries, suffering, and the amounts awarded to each appellee. We have considered these questions in the light of the testimony. Our conclusion is that the case was properly submitted to the jury and that the damages awarded cannot be adjudged excessive.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellees, a married couple, were tenants of appellant. They sued for damages for alleged injuries and loss of services caused by the wife’s falling upon a walk alleged to have been maintained by appellant in an icy and dangerous condition. The jury awarded $2500 to the wife and $500 to the husband.

Appellant raises several questions. They involve sufficiency of evidence as to negligence, injuries, suffering, and the amounts awarded to each appellee. We have considered these questions in the light of the testimony. Our conclusion is that the case was properly submitted to the jury and that the damages awarded cannot be adjudged excessive.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 F.2d 214, 88 U.S. App. D.C. 151, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brentwood-village-corp-v-unger-cadc-1951.