Brentwood Realty Co. v. Moses
73 Pa. Super. 307, 1920 Pa. Super. LEXIS 6
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 28, 1920·No. Appeal, No. 236·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Nothing can be added profitably to the concise and well-sustained conclusions reached in the opinion of the learned court below in entering judgment non obstante veredicto. The facts out of which the controversy arises are all in writing and are undisputed.
For the reasons given by the learned trial judge the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brentwood Realty Co. v. Moses, 73 Pa. Super. 307, 1920 Pa. Super. LEXIS 6 (Pa. Ct. App. 1920).
73 Pa. Super. 307 (Brentwood Realty Co. v. Moses) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Allegheny Center Associates v. Appliance Store, Inc. (In Re Appliance Store, Inc.)
148 B.R. 226 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1992)
Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Asbury Park v. Pepsico, Inc.
282 A.2d 643 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1971)
Klugh Estate
66 A.2d 822 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1949)
Weldon & Kelly Co. v. Pavia Co.
46 A.2d 466 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Leo P. Rich v. G.W. Pifer Sons
100 Pa. Super. 483 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Coastwise Lumber & Supply Co. v. Stitzinger
81 Pa. Super. 554 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)