Brents v. Barnett

7 Ky. 251, 4 Bibb 251, 1815 Ky. LEXIS 139
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided November 14, 1815·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION of the Court, by

Judge Owseey.

The appellants were plaintiffs in the court below in a writ of error coram vobis brought by them against the appeHee. The writ of error, by the decision of that court, was dismissed, and a judgment for ten per centum damages on the amount suspended entered in favor of the defendant there against the plaintiff.

Although by the entry in that court the term plaintiff, in the singular number, is used, there can be no question but what the judgment should be construed to be against both of the plaintiffs there ; and as the court acted correctly in dismissing the writ of error, thé judgment for damages was strictly proper.

The judgment must he affirmed with damages upon the damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brents v. Barnett, 7 Ky. 251, 4 Bibb 251, 1815 Ky. LEXIS 139 (Ky. Ct. App. 1815).

7 Ky. 251 (Brents v. Barnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

E. R. Wiggins Builders Supplies, Inc. v. Smith
149 A.2d 360 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1959)
Smith v. Mitchel
8 Ky. 207 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1818)