Brentano's, Inc. v. Charter Management Corp.

46 A.D.2d 861, 361 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3456
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 5, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 46 A.D.2d 861 (Brentano's, Inc. v. Charter Management Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brentano's, Inc. v. Charter Management Corp., 46 A.D.2d 861, 361 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered August 9, 1973, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motion of defendant-appellant to dismiss the complaint granted and the complaint dismissed. Appellant shall recover of respondent $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The true party in interest in this suit by tenant against landlord for water damage to its property is the former’s insurance carrier, as subrogee. The lease between the parties provides for each to carry its own insurance and to look thereto for coverage without any right of subrogation. Special Term regarded this agreement as void as in violation of section 5-321 of the General Obligations Law. It is not. (See Bandbox Sportswear v. Fashion Ware Realty Co., 33 A D 2d 537 and 614 Third Ave. Corp. v. Grand Iron Works, 44 A D 2d 531.) “ The subject contract is one indemnifying an owner [here read ‘lessee’] for the latter’s negligence and does not fall within the statute. Each participant in the contract was to procure insurance to cover his own risks. This is not to contract away liability.” (614 Third Ave., p. 531.) A fortiori, this is so here, where the lease provided further that if either party “is required to pay its insurer an additional premium for the waiver of subrogation of its rights * * * the [other] will pay such additional premium ”. Concur, McGivern, P. J., Markewieh, Nunez and Macken, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

H & M Hennes & Mauritz LP v. Skanska USA Building, Inc.
617 F. Supp. 2d 152 (E.D. New York, 2008)
Ins. Co. of North America v. Borsdorff Servs., Inc.
225 A.D.2d 494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Viacom International, Inc. v. Midtown Realty Co.
193 A.D.2d 45 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Cidis v. Net Realty Holding Trust
143 A.D.2d 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Metropolitan Art Associates v. Wexler
118 A.D.2d 548 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Interested Underwriters at Lloyds v. Ducor's, Inc.
103 A.D.2d 76 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Extaza of 34th Street v. City Stores Co.
97 A.D.2d 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Graphic Arts Supply, Inc. v. Raynor
91 A.D.2d 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Motors Insurance v. American Garages, Inc.
98 Misc. 2d 887 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Board of Education, Union Free School District No. 3 v. Valden Associates, Inc.
60 A.D.2d 617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Hogeland v. Sibley
366 N.E.2d 263 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A.D.2d 861, 361 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brentanos-inc-v-charter-management-corp-nyappdiv-1974.