Brent v. Coyle
This text of 4 F. Cas. 62 (Brent v. Coyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE COURT
contra) informed Mr. Ashton that the construction given by him to the act of 1785, c. -80, was that which had been uniformly given by the courts of Maryland, and requested him to confine his argument to the question whether the discontinuance can be taken advantage of after verdict.
Mr. Ashton and Mr. Jones, in reply, contended that the writ was abated, and therefore no judgment could be rendered. 5 Com. Dig. 537; Salk. 77. After the death of R. "Brent, the cause could not be continued by consent, and the court could not continue it beyond the tenth day of the second term :after the suggestion of the death.
THE COURT, after several days’ consideration, was of opinion (nem. con.) that the •discontinuance was cured by the verdict. A writ of error was taken, but not prosecuted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 F. Cas. 62, 2 Cranch 287, 1822 U.S. App. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brent-v-coyle-circtddc-1822.