Brent v. Chapman

9 U.S. 358, 3 L. Ed. 125, 5 Cranch 358, 1809 U.S. LEXIS 447
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 15, 1809
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 9 U.S. 358 (Brent v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brent v. Chapman, 9 U.S. 358, 3 L. Ed. 125, 5 Cranch 358, 1809 U.S. LEXIS 447 (1809).

Opinion

March 13.

Marshaxx, Ch. J.

delivered the opinion of the ttourt to the.following effect;

This court is of opinion that the possession of Chapman was a bar to the seizure of' th’e slave by the marshal, under the execution stated, in this casé. The only objection of any weight was, that there was no administration upon the estáte of Robert Alexander, sen. and, consequently, that the possession of Chapman, was not an adverse possession.

But there was án executor competent to assent, and who did assent, to the legacy, and to the partition between the legatees, and who could not after-wards refuse to execute the will.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. Redman
295 U.S. 654 (Supreme Court, 1935)
Rees v. Rees
96 S.E. 1019 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1918)
Blair v. United States
241 F. 217 (Ninth Circuit, 1917)
O'Neill v. General Film Co.
152 N.Y.S. 599 (New York Supreme Court, 1915)
Lightfoot v. . Davis
91 N.E. 582 (New York Court of Appeals, 1910)
Morris v. Lyon
4 S.E. 734 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1888)
Hall v. Webb
21 W. Va. 318 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1883)
Moore v. State
43 N.J.L. 203 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1881)
Bunce v. Bidwell
5 N.W. 1023 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1880)
Huffman v. Alderson's Admr.
9 W. Va. 616 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1876)
Coleman v. Holmes
44 Ala. 124 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1870)
Cunningham v. Frandtzen
26 Tex. 34 (Texas Supreme Court, 1861)
Hicks v. Fluit
21 Ark. 463 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1860)
Sprecker v. Wakeley
11 Wis. 432 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1860)
Sadler v. Sadler
16 Ark. 628 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1856)
Alexander v. Burnet
39 S.C.L. 189 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1851)
Jones v. Jones
18 Ala. 248 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1850)
Townsend v. Jemison
50 U.S. 407 (Supreme Court, 1850)
Wynn v. Lee
5 Ga. 217 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1848)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 U.S. 358, 3 L. Ed. 125, 5 Cranch 358, 1809 U.S. LEXIS 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brent-v-chapman-scotus-1809.