Brent Ristow v. Douglas Peterson

Eighth Circuit

Brent Ristow v. Douglas Peterson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 15, 2023

Docket22-3029

StatusUnpublished

This text of Brent Ristow v. Douglas Peterson (Brent Ristow v. Douglas Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brent Ristow v. Douglas Peterson, (8th Cir. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 22-3029 ___________________________

Brent A. Ristow

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Douglas R. Peterson; Thomas Henry Boyd; Juan G. Hoyos; John Michael Koneck; Mark S. Kuppe; Shawne M. Monahan; Cheryl M. Prince; Pamela A. Thein; Timothy Yuen Wong; Carol Martens; Erin C. Wacker; Natasha Karn; Karen McGillic; Amanda Cunningham

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________

Submitted: February 6, 2023 Filed: February 15, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________

Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Brent Ristow appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se action, brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, challenging the proceedings which culminated in the denial of his admission to the Minnesota Bar. Upon careful de novo review, see Chase v. Andeavor Logistics, L.P., 12 F.4th 864, 868 (8th Cir. 2021) (standard of review), we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court.

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI