Brent Paul Venrooy v. State of Florida
This text of Brent Paul Venrooy v. State of Florida (Brent Paul Venrooy v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 5D2025-0345 LT Case No. 2023-001316-CFMA _____________________________
BRENT PAUL VENROOY,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County. R. Lee Smith, Judge.
Thomas J. Butler, of Thomas Butler, P.A., Miami Beach, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
April 17, 2026
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the entry of a corrected judgment striking the $100 fee for investigative costs because the
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). investigative costs were never requested. See Richards v. State, 288 So. 3d 574, 577 (Fla. 2020) (“[T]he State must request investigative costs to make a defendant liable for those costs . . . .”).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.
JAY, C.J., and LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brent Paul Venrooy v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brent-paul-venrooy-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.