Brent Lee Crockett v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 31, 2006·No. 07-04-00438-CR·Published

Opinion

NO. 07-04-0438-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 31, 2006

______________________________

BRENT LEE CROCKETT, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 84 TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY;

NO. 8792; HONORABLE WILLIAM D. SMITH, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before this Court is appellant’s pro se motion to dismiss his appeal.   It is signed by appellant.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of the Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Also pending is the motion to withdraw filed by Donald F. Schofield, appellant’s appointed counsel, which motion accompanied counsel’s Anders (footnote: 1) brief.  The appeal having been dismissed, we dismiss counsel’s motion to withdraw as moot.  

James T. Campbell

       Justice

Do not publish.

FOOTNOTES

1:

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brent Lee Crockett v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Brent Lee Crockett v. State (Brent Lee Crockett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)