Brent Lee Crockett v. State
This text of Brent Lee Crockett v. State (Brent Lee Crockett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-04-0438-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
JANUARY 31, 2006
______________________________
BRENT LEE CROCKETT, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM THE 84 TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY;
NO. 8792; HONORABLE WILLIAM D. SMITH, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before this Court is appellant’s pro se motion to dismiss his appeal. It is signed by appellant. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of the Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Also pending is the motion to withdraw filed by Donald F. Schofield, appellant’s appointed counsel, which motion accompanied counsel’s Anders (footnote: 1) brief. The appeal having been dismissed, we dismiss counsel’s motion to withdraw as moot.
James T. Campbell
Justice
Do not publish.
FOOTNOTES
1:
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brent Lee Crockett v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brent-lee-crockett-v-state-texapp-2006.