Brent J. Shupe and Jcj Trucking, and Midwest Coast Transport D/B/A McT v. John Lingafelter, Kathleen Lingafelter, Mark Girgus, and Carrie Girgus, Individually and as Next Friends for Kaley Girgus, a Minor Matthew Teague, Brenda Teague, and Daniel Leon Jackson and Lisa Boyd

CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedMay 5, 2006
Docket05-0083
StatusPublished

This text of Brent J. Shupe and Jcj Trucking, and Midwest Coast Transport D/B/A McT v. John Lingafelter, Kathleen Lingafelter, Mark Girgus, and Carrie Girgus, Individually and as Next Friends for Kaley Girgus, a Minor Matthew Teague, Brenda Teague, and Daniel Leon Jackson and Lisa Boyd (Brent J. Shupe and Jcj Trucking, and Midwest Coast Transport D/B/A McT v. John Lingafelter, Kathleen Lingafelter, Mark Girgus, and Carrie Girgus, Individually and as Next Friends for Kaley Girgus, a Minor Matthew Teague, Brenda Teague, and Daniel Leon Jackson and Lisa Boyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brent J. Shupe and Jcj Trucking, and Midwest Coast Transport D/B/A McT v. John Lingafelter, Kathleen Lingafelter, Mark Girgus, and Carrie Girgus, Individually and as Next Friends for Kaley Girgus, a Minor Matthew Teague, Brenda Teague, and Daniel Leon Jackson and Lisa Boyd, (Tex. 2006).

Opinion

May 05, 2006

Mr. Jack McKinley Ramey, Chandler, McKinley & Zito, P.C. 750 Bering, Suite 600 Houston, TX 77057 Mr. Kevin B. Miller Law Offices of Miller & & Bicklein 3223 S. Loop 289, Suite 150 Lubbock, TX 79423

RE: Case Number: 05-0083 Court of Appeals Number: 10-03-00113-CV Trial Court Number: C2K09299

Style: BRENT J. SHUPE AND JCJ TRUCKING, AND MIDWEST COAST TRANSPORT D/B/A MCT v. JOHN LINGAFELTER, KATHLEEN LINGAFELTER, MARK GIRGUS, AND CARRIE GIRGUS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS FOR KALEY GIRGUS, A MINOR; MATTHEW TEAGUE, BRENDA TEAGUE, AND DANIEL LEON JACKSON AND LISA BOYD

Dear Counsel:

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and renders judgment and delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.

Sincerely, [pic]

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk Enclosures |cc:|Ms. Candace | | |Garrett | | |Ms. Sharri | | |Roessler |

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brent J. Shupe and Jcj Trucking, and Midwest Coast Transport D/B/A McT v. John Lingafelter, Kathleen Lingafelter, Mark Girgus, and Carrie Girgus, Individually and as Next Friends for Kaley Girgus, a Minor Matthew Teague, Brenda Teague, and Daniel Leon Jackson and Lisa Boyd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brent-j-shupe-and-jcj-trucking-and-midwest-coast-transport-dba-mct-v-tex-2006.