Brent Alan Lloyd v. Kimberlee Hansen, et al.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri
DecidedNovember 3, 2025
Docket4:25-cv-00963
StatusUnknown

This text of Brent Alan Lloyd v. Kimberlee Hansen, et al. (Brent Alan Lloyd v. Kimberlee Hansen, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brent Alan Lloyd v. Kimberlee Hansen, et al., (E.D. Mo. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

BRENT ALAN LLOYD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:25-cv-0963-MTS ) KIMBERLEE HANSEN, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on review of the file. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), if a defendant is not served within ninety days after the complaint is filed, the Court “must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant” or “order that service be made within a specified time.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Well over ninety days have passed since Plaintiff* filed this action, but there is no indication in the record of

service having been completed, see id. at 4(l)(1), nor an indication that Defendants agreed to waive service, see id. at 4(d)(4). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than Thursday, November 13, 2025, Plaintiff must serve Defendants and file proof of service or file Defendants’ signed waivers

* Plaintiff is responsible for having the summons and complaint served on Defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c). It makes no difference that Plaintiff here is pro se. See DiCesare v. Stuart, 12 F.3d 973, 980 (10th Cir. 1993) (“A pro se litigant is still obligated to follow the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.”); Davis v. D.C. Dep’t of Corr., 1:25-cv-1895-JMC, 2025 WL 1743940, at *2 n.1 (D.D.C. June 24, 2025) (noting same). of service. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m). Dated this 3rd day of November 2025. eC oHEW T. SCHELP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

_2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brent Alan Lloyd v. Kimberlee Hansen, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brent-alan-lloyd-v-kimberlee-hansen-et-al-moed-2025.