Brenner v. Wright

188 S.E. 694, 183 Ga. 510
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 25, 1936·No. No. 11467·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

“The first grant of a new trial, though predicated exclusively on special legal grounds, will not be disturbed by this court, unless it affirmatively appears that the verdict complained of was absolutely demanded.” Harvey v. Bowles, 112 Ga. 363 (37 S. E. 363); Rowe Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs County, 152 Ga. 548 (110 S. E. 303), and cit.; Medders v. Blackshear Manufacturing Co., 180 Ga. 550 (179 S. E. 628); Blitch v. Wells, 180 Ga. 566 (179 S. E. 629). In this case the law and facts did not demand the verdict. The motion for new trial was based on general and special grounds. The judgment complained of is the first grant of a new trial, and will not be reversed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brenner v. Wright, 188 S.E. 694, 183 Ga. 510 (Ga. 1936).

188 S.E. 694 (Brenner v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. J. S. H. Company
40 S.E.2d 752 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Brenner v. Wright
2 S.E.2d 410 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Baker v. McGarr
1 S.E.2d 403 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)