Brenner v. Wright
This text of 188 S.E. 694 (Brenner v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
“The first grant of a new trial, though predicated exclusively on special legal grounds, will not be disturbed by this court, unless it affirmatively appears that the verdict complained of was absolutely demanded.” Harvey v. Bowles, 112 Ga. 363 (37 S. E. 363); Rowe Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs County, 152 Ga. 548 (110 S. E. 303), and cit.; Medders v. Blackshear Manufacturing Co., 180 Ga. 550 (179 S. E. 628); Blitch v. Wells, 180 Ga. 566 (179 S. E. 629). In this case the law and facts did not demand the verdict. The motion for new trial was based on general and special grounds. The judgment complained of is the first grant of a new trial, and will not be reversed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 S.E. 694, 183 Ga. 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brenner-v-wright-ga-1936.