Brenner v. State ex rel. Spisak

31 Ohio C.C. Dec. 661
CourtCuyahoga Circuit Court
DecidedJune 11, 1907
StatusPublished

This text of 31 Ohio C.C. Dec. 661 (Brenner v. State ex rel. Spisak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cuyahoga Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brenner v. State ex rel. Spisak, 31 Ohio C.C. Dec. 661 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1907).

Opinion

WINCH, J.

The sole question in this case is whether a judgment debtor, against whom proceedings in aid of execution have been brought before a justice of the peace, as provided in Sec. 6080-1 R. S. et seq. (Sec. 10463 G. C. et seq.) is entitled to appeal said proceedings to the common pleas court.

This question was raised in.the case of Deveaux v. Leslie, 9 Circ. Dec. 480 (18 R., 482), and the Lucas county circuit court, Judge Haynes delivering the opinion, held that an appeal would lie in such cases. .

This court, in the ease of Carlin v. Hower, 24 O. C. C., 153 (5 N. S. 70), concurred in said opinion, and we now see no reason for changing our views on the subject.

The case of Wilson Co. v. Cleveland Electric Ry. 28 O. C. C. 159 (7 N. S. 258), does not overrule the ease of Carlin v. Hower, supra on this proposition.

Judgment affirmed.

Marvin and Henry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Ohio C.C. Dec. 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brenner-v-state-ex-rel-spisak-ohcirctcuyahoga-1907.