Brenner v. McNeill
This text of 141 So. 742 (Brenner v. McNeill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause having been submitted to the Court upoh the transcript of the record of the final decree herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no reversible error in the said decree. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Warren v. Creevey, 87 Fla. 46, 52, 99 So. 247, 249; Adams v. Essex, 1 Bibb (Ky.) 149, 4 Am. Dec. 623; Trustees of I. I. Fund v. Lewis, 34 Fla. 424, 16 So. 325; Taylor v. Am. National Bank, 63 Fla. 631, 57 So. 678; 3 R. C. L. 1272, section 502; Owings Lumber Co. vs. Marlowe, 200 Ala. 568, 76 So. 926; L. R. A. 1918-E, 180 et seq.; Sections 4499 and 5744 C. G. L., Scott vs. Taylor, 63 Fla. 612, 58 So. 30; McClure v. American Nat’l Bank, 67 Fla. 32, 64 So. 427; 8 C. J. 127, 342, 344, 478, 41 C. J. 507-509, 662, 693-4.
Affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 So. 742, 105 Fla. 541, 1932 Fla. LEXIS 1234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brenner-v-mcneill-fla-1932.