Brenner v. Liebowitz
This text of 1 N.J. Misc. 7 (Brenner v. Liebowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant had a judgment in the court below and the plaintiff appeals. The case is submitted on briefs and we have only the brief for appellant.
The state of the case does not contain any specification under rule 145 of this court, of the “determinations or directions of the District Court with respect to which the appellant is dissatisfied in point of law” and upon which the rule prescribes that the appeal shall be solely heard. Kearns v. Waldron, 76 N. J. L. 370; Calvin v. Ostrander Fire Brick Co., 84 Id. 531; Sentliffer v. Jacobs, 84 Id. 129.
Under the practice indicated in the last case the appeal will be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.J. Misc. 7, 1923 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brenner-v-liebowitz-nj-1923.