Brenner Bros. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 408
United States Customs Court·Decided January 7, 1958·No. No. 61437; protests 243930-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “K” consist of kidskin plates the same in all material respeets as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and the items marked “L” of lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1802, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brenner Bros. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 408 (cusc 1958).

40 Cust. Ct. 408 (Brenner Bros. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 266 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)
A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States
33 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)
Prime Fur Corp. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 83 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)