Brenneman' Estate

17 Pa. Super. 75, 1901 Pa. Super. LEXIS 256
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 16, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 17·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

William W. Portee., J.,

The agreement upon which the award in distribution was made to the appellee was in writing. It was under seal. It was, by its own recitals, based upon a “ valuable consideration.” [81]*81It was between brothers and sisters, children of the testator. Its purpose was the equalization of distribution of his estate among them, and was, therefore, in the nature of a family settlement. It was clearly a binding and enforceable obligation. It is urged that it was executed in consideration of a promise that the moneys passing under it would be returned by the mating of a will by the sister receiving the benefit. The auditor finds against this contention on the facts, and an examination of the testimony before him warranted the finding. Nothing by way of discussion can be profitably added to the opinion filed by the court below in confirmation of the auditor’s report. We are unanimously of the opinion that the decree made must stand and it is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brenneman' Estate, 17 Pa. Super. 75, 1901 Pa. Super. LEXIS 256 (Pa. Ct. App. 1901).

17 Pa. Super. 75 (Brenneman' Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Iacovino v. Caterino
2 A.2d 828 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Devore's Estate
89 Pa. Super. 47 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)