Brennan v. R.C. Dolner, Inc.

14 A.D.3d 639, 789 N.Y.S.2d 312, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 840
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 14 A.D.3d 639 (Brennan v. R.C. Dolner, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brennan v. R.C. Dolner, Inc., 14 A.D.3d 639, 789 N.Y.S.2d 312, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 840 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated August 6, 2003, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action for contractual indemnification asserted in the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The third-party defendant failed to demonstrate, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with regard to the causes of action for contractual indemnification asserted in the third-party complaint (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Contrary to the third-party defendant’s argument, absent a finding of negligence on the part of the third-party plaintiff, the prohibition against indemnifying a contractor for its own negligence in General Obligations Law § 5-322.1 is inapplicable (see Brown v Two Exch. Plaza Partners, 76 NY2d 172, 179 [1990]). Here, no finding has yet been made with respect to the third-party plaintiffs fault, if any, in the happening of the accident. Thus, an award of summary judgment dismissing the causes of action for contractual indemnification would have been premature (see Maxwell v Toys “R” Us, 258 AD2d 630 [1999]).

The third-party defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Woodlands Condominium Assn.
2020 NY Slip Op 4454 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Wilson v. Nassau Univ. Med. Ctr.
2018 NY Slip Op 7171 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Yakima Tingling v. C.I.N.H.R., Inc.
120 A.D.3d 570 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Davis v. All State Associates
23 A.D.3d 607 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Alesius v. Good Samaritan Hospital Medical & Dialysis Center
23 A.D.3d 508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 A.D.3d 639, 789 N.Y.S.2d 312, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brennan-v-rc-dolner-inc-nyappdiv-2005.