Brennan v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

186 A.D.2d 527, 588 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11140

This text of 186 A.D.2d 527 (Brennan v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brennan v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp., 186 A.D.2d 527, 588 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), dated November 27, 1989, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants and against him.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the trial court did not err in denying his motion to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence. It is well settled that issues regarding the credibility of witnesses and the accuracy of their testimony are for the jury to determine, and its verdict should not be set aside if it could have been reached by any fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Jurgen v Linesburgh, 159 AD2d 689; Frangello v Namm, 157 AD2d 649; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129). Here, the evidence supports the jury’s determination that the police officers did not commit a battery upon the plaintiff. Furthermore, we find that, under a fair interpretation of the evidence, the defendant City of New York transported the plaintiff for medical treatment within a reasonable period of time and the defendant New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation did not aggravate the plaintiff’s injuries.

[528]*528The court properly instructed the jury with respect to the elements of a battery (see, PJI 3:3). The plaintiffs remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see, Harvey v Mazal Am. Partners, 79 NY2d 218, 225; Robillard v Robbins, 78 NY2d 1105, 1106). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harvey v. Mazal American Partners
79 N.Y.2d 218 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
Robillard v. Robbins
585 N.E.2d 375 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
Nicastro v. Park
113 A.D.2d 129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Frangello v. Namm
157 A.D.2d 649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Jurgen v. Linesburgh
159 A.D.2d 689 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 A.D.2d 527, 588 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brennan-v-new-york-city-health-hospitals-corp-nyappdiv-1992.