Brennan v. Mabey's Moving & Storage, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brennan v. Mabey's Moving & Storage, Inc.

226 A.D.2d 938, 640 N.Y.S.2d 686, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 226 A.D.2d 938 (Brennan v. Mabey's Moving & Storage, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brennan v. Mabey's Moving & Storage, Inc., 226 A.D.2d 938, 640 N.Y.S.2d 686, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Yesawich Jr., J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Cobb, J.), entered December 27, 1994 in Greene County, which denied defendant’s motion to limit the proof on the issue of damages.

On June 28, 1990, plaintiff John P. Brennan (hereinafter plaintiff) allegedly sustained physical injury to his arm and debilitating psychological sequelae, as a result of being pinned for approximately one hour by a motorized gate located on defendant’s premises. Plaintiff assertedly began having nightmares and other symptoms of emotional distress several months after the accident. In March 1991, he was diagnosed as suffering from delayed onset posttraumatic stress disorder. He avers, in his supplemental bills of particulars, that his psychological problems increased significantly when he learned that a similar accident had occurred in June 1991, in which a 12-year-old girl, to whom he was not related, was trapped and fatally injured by the same gate. Defendant’s motion in limine to preclude plaintiff from eliciting any proof of this aggravation of his injuries was denied, prompting this appeal.

The appeal must be dismissed, for no appeal lies from the grant or denial of a pretrial ruling on the admissibility of evidence (see, Hargrave v Presher, 221 AD2d 677, 678; Hough v Hicks, 160 AD2d 1114, 1117, lv denied 77 NY2d 802). Appellate review of such a ruling must be deferred until after trial when the relevance of the proffered evidence, and the effect of Supreme Court’s ruling with respect thereto, can be assessed in the context of the record as a whole.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yesawich Jr., J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Cobb, J.), entered December 27, 1994 in Greene County, which denied defendant’s motion to limit the proof on the issue of damages.

On June 28, 1990, plaintiff John P. Brennan (hereinafter plaintiff) allegedly sustained physical injury to his arm and debilitating psychological sequelae, as a result of being pinned for approximately one hour by a motorized gate located on defendant’s premises. Plaintiff assertedly began having nightmares and other symptoms of emotional distress several months after the accident. In March 1991, he was diagnosed as suffering from delayed onset posttraumatic stress disorder. He avers, in his supplemental bills of particulars, that his psychological problems increased significantly when he learned that a similar accident had occurred in June 1991, in which a 12-year-old girl, to whom he was not related, was trapped and fatally injured by the same gate. Defendant’s motion in limine to preclude plaintiff from eliciting any proof of this aggravation of his injuries was denied, prompting this appeal.

The appeal must be dismissed, for no appeal lies from the grant or denial of a pretrial ruling on the admissibility of evidence (see, Hargrave v Presher, 221 AD2d 677, 678; Hough v Hicks, 160 AD2d 1114, 1117, lv denied 77 NY2d 802). Appellate review of such a ruling must be deferred until after trial when the relevance of the proffered evidence, and the effect of Supreme Court’s ruling with respect thereto, can be assessed in the context of the record as a whole.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 A.D.2d 938, 640 N.Y.S.2d 686, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brennan-v-mabeys-moving-storage-inc-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack