Brennan v. Caruso

108 A.D.2d 634, 485 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42986

This text of 108 A.D.2d 634 (Brennan v. Caruso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brennan v. Caruso, 108 A.D.2d 634, 485 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinions

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Taylor, J.), entered October 24, 1983, which dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, affirmed, without costs and disbursements.

We affirm for the reasons stated by Justice Taylor. We would only add that plaintiff funds’ voluntary withdrawal from the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association’s Health & Welfare Fund was not a mutual disassociation by two contracting parties, as argued by the dissent. When plaintiffs unilaterally left the fund they relinquished all rights in the surplus, and any “windfall” is of their own choosing. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman and Sullivan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 A.D.2d 634, 485 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brennan-v-caruso-nyappdiv-1985.